Does a financial abuser remain an “abuser” until they’ve righted their wrong?
I often think about how long after a relationship a domestic abuser can still be considered an abuser, and I know it varies from case to case. The circumstances of my abuser have me wondering if an expiration date for that title is even possible…
If someone commits financial abuse, such as by stealing thousands of dollars from a partner, does the title “financial abuser” now get to define them for the rest of their life — or is there an expiration when someone is no longer considered an abuser or financial abuser?
Example: My ex-fiancé used our house to defraud me of tens of thousands. Despite occasionally admitting that what she did was fraudulent (and then cheaply trying to justify it), she has not fully accepted responsibility and will likely never return a dime of what was stolen. She continues to live in and host friends (aka, enablers) at the house she used my stolen money for.
Like any property, this investment will likely follow and benefit her for the rest of her life. Therefore, is it safe to say that (unless $30k randomly appears in my bank) she will remain a financial abuser forever? When we are in our 80s and she’s still coasting off our/HER investment, will she still be an abuser?
(Personal note: I’m asking this to validate and ease my own resentment, figuring out how I frame this part of my life as I move on. While I know it could be quite negative and possibly harmful to myself to always consider my ex an abuser, I also feel, given the circumstances, it’s naive to consider she will ever not be an abuser if the abuse/harm isn’t amended.)