u/Mansur754

On August 19, 1979, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini formally declared a religious fatwa of jihad against the Kurdish people and political organizations in Rojhilat. This decree followed a breakdown in negotiations over regional autonomy from August 16th to 18th and sudden escalations in towns like Pawe. Khomeini ordered the full might of the Iranian regular armed forces (Artesh) and the newly formed Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to aggressively reclaim towns and military garrisons that had fallen under the governance of local Kurdish councils and Peshmerga forces.

The campaign was operationally led by key Iranian political and military figures under the direct command of Ayatollah Khomeini. Minister of Defense Mustafa Chamran and President Abolhassan Banisadr (who later directed the 1980 spring offensive) organized the military movements, alongside IRGC commanders such as Abbas Agha-Zamaniz (known as Abu Sharif). Judicially, the terror of the jihad was driven by Ayatollah Sadeq Khalkhali, who served as the chief justice of the newly formed Revolutionary Courts. Khalkhali traveled immediately behind advancing frontlines, holding brief summary trials in makeshift courtrooms that universally resulted in mass public executions of Kurdish activists, students, and citizens accused of counter-revolutionary behavior.

The human and material toll of this state-sponsored holy war was devastating for the region. Human rights organizations, including Amnesty International, report that approximately 10,000 Kurds were killed throughout the broader post-revolutionary rebellion and subsequent campaigns. This death toll includes at least 1,200 Kurdish political activists, prisoners, and suspected partisans who were summarily executed without due process. The intense ground assaults, jet fighter bombings, and tank incursions resulted in hundreds of Kurdish villages, towns, and neighborhoods being systematically razed or heavily damaged. The resulting violence triggered a massive humanitarian crisis, displacing an estimated 200,000 civilians who fled into the surrounding Zagros mountains or crossed inro southern Kurdistan to escape the advancing security forces.

Most of the mass killings and intense urban combat occurred in primary Kurdish provinces in rojhelat. The heavy urban warfare and civilian massacres were concentrated in Sine, Pawe, Saqiz, and Mahabad. Outside the cities, the military targeted rural areas suspected of harboring Peshmerga fighters, resulting in mass executions of unarmed rural populations. The most infamous instance occurred during the Qarna massacre, where IRGC forces and state-aligned militiamen entered the village of Qarna and executed dozens of Kurdish civilians, including women and children, in an act of collective retribution.

The ethnic dynamics of kurdish provinces with azeri settlers heavily influenced the violence, as local pro-regime Azeri populations were mobilized by Tehran against the Kurdish movement. Under the guidance of hardline pro-Khomeini Azeri clerics, most notably Mullah Gholamreza Hassani of Urme, local Azeri militias were formed and armed. These groups actively collaborated with the IRGC, serving as local operational guides and front-line. This alignment turned ethnically mixed border zones into active conflict sectors, transforming a political dispute for regional autonomy into bitter, localized ethnic clashes between Kurdish nationalists and state-backed Azeri loyalists.

Sources:

Haunted Memories: The Islamic Republic’s Executions of Kurds in 1979: https://iranhrdc.org/haunted-memories-the-islamic-republics-executions-of-kurds-in-1979/

Destruction of towns, villages, and civilian displacement: https://kurdshop.net/en/history/2792

Primary killing locations and the Qarna Massacre: https://blog.iranrights.org/remembering-qarna-38-years-ago-iranian-security-forces-massacred-kurdish-civilians/

The role of Azeris and local militias: https://www.bbc.com/audio/play/w3ct3c0t

The displacement of 200,000 individuals, internally or externally: https://dckurd.org/2020/06/16/webinar-iranian-kurds-challenges-existence-and-goals/

The kurdish slogan does not apply to every single women on this planet especially the women who oppose an independent kurdistan or support the oppression and killing of kurdish women, the slogan was made by kurds and it's kurdish, freedom for kurdish women is an independent kurdistan and if you don't like it then you're not entitled to this slogan, I've seen so many persians proudly say zin, zindgi izadi and they keep going back to the same hocus-pocus nonsense that we shouldn't devide the country and kurds deserve rights in the country, NO!. Kurdish independence is the only true rights given to kurds and end of discussion. You people don't deserve to take the slogan and use it as yours AND IT DOESN'T APPLY TO ANY OF YOU WHO DON'T SUPPORT AN INDEPENDENT KURDISTAN

The kurdish slogan does not apply to every single women on this planet especially the women who oppose an independent kurdistan or support the oppression and killing of kurdish women, the slogan was made by kurds and it's kurdish, freedom for kurdish women is an independent kurdistan and if you don't like it then you're not entitled to this slogan, I've seen so many persians proudly say zin, zindgi izadi and they keep going back to the same hocus-pocus nonsense that we shouldn't devide the country and kurds deserve rights in the country, NO!. Kurdish independence is the only true rights given to kurds and end of discussion. You people don't deserve to take the slogan and use it as yours AND IT DOESN'T APPLY TO ANY OF YOU WHO DON'T SUPPORT AN INDEPENDENT KURDISTAN

In 331 when the Macedonian forces dismantled the persian forces near hawler which was the start of the Downfall of the persian empire, at that time a median king called Atropates ruled over the medes ( kurds ), because of his skills and capabilities he managed to form a strong relationship with Alexander and the greek army, later with Alexander they go to the city of susa and married on of his daughters to a great greek general called Perdiccas, which is pointed out by both strabo and justin.

1. Strabo (Writing ~2,000 Years Ago)Strabo was a Greek geographer and historian who lived from roughly 64 BC to 24 AD. In his famous work Geography (specifically Book 11), he details exactly how Atropates saved his homeland from foreign domination, Strabo also wrote that Atropates "prevented this country, which was a part of Greater Media, from becoming subject to the Macedonians." He explicitly explicitly credits Atropates for the name of the region, writing that Media Atropatene got its name directly from the commander Atropates, which is now called Azerbaijan

2. Justin (Writing ~1,800 Years Ago)Marcus Junianus Justinus (known simply as Justin) was a Roman historian who lived around the 2nd or 3rd century AD. In his Epitome of Pompeius Trogus (Book 13), he tracks the specific political fallout right after Alexander's death: Justin notes that during the Partition of Babylon (323 BC), the massive region of Media was split into two. Great Media (the south/east) went to a Macedonian general named Peithon, while Little Media (the northwest) was left to Atropates. Justin's texts, alongside the historian Arrian, serve as the source confirming that Atropates' daughter was married directly to Perdiccas to seal their high-stakes political alliance.

Atropates name means "fire protecter" atr being a median word and pates or pat in median meaning protect and yan ( یان ) meaning place in kurdish and median, the capital city of atropatia was called ganjak in rojhelat of kurdistan, it comes from the word ganj which means treasure and the suffix of ak and in modern day kurdish it means a youngster, Islamic geographers and historians from 800 years ago, most notably Yaqut al-Hamawi (1179–1229 AD), directly preserved this linguistic and historical link in their classical works.In his famous geographical encyclopedia, Mu'jam al-Buldan (The Dictionary of Countries), Yaqut explicitly breaks down the etymology of Azerbaijan and traces it back to its Zoroastrian and royal roots. Azar (or Adhar): Meaning Fire in the old native tongues ( median ).Baigan (or Payegan): Meaning Keeper, Guardian, or Protector.The Full Definition: Therefore, he records that the name means "The Place Where Fire is Protected" or "The Guardian of Fire," perfectly identifying its history as a sanctuary for sacred Zoroastrian flames.Linking it to Atropates (The King)Yaqut and other classical Islamic historians did not just look at the words; they explicitly tied the region to its founder. He notes that Azer (or Azarbad) was the name of a powerful local king or governor who ruled the region.While the Arabic spelling shifted over centuries from the Greek "Atropates" into forms like Azarbad, Aturpat, or Adharbad, Islamic scholars correctly remembered him as the ancient ruler who gave his name to the territory. They documented that he was a mighty defender of the land, preserving its autonomy and its holy fire temples (like the legendary Adhur Gushnasp) from total destruction during the chaotic shifts of ancient empires. He states that he was the son of Al-Aswad, who was the son of Sam (Shem), the son of Nuh (Noah). However, in the same historical breath, he and other classical chroniclers (drawing heavily from local traditions) synchronize this lineage directly with the final rulers of the Medes. They explicitly tie the ancestry back to Azhdahak (frequently written as Azdahak or Dahhak in Arabic scripts).

Movses Khorenatsi (Moses of Chorene), who is universally known as the "Father of Armenian History". He lived and wrote roughly 1,500 years ago (in the 5th century AD). According to Khorenatsi, when the Armenian king Tigranes allying with Cyrus the Great overthrew the Median Empire, Tigranes took the first wife of Azhdahak—a queen named Anuysh (or Anush)—along with thousands of Median captives and family members.Tigranes settled these royal Median captives in the lands along the eastern slopes of Mount Ararat and down towards the borders of Nakhchivan / Azerbaijan, near the Aras River. Khorenatsi explicitly writes that these people were the direct descendants of the Median king Azhdahak. He notes that they preserved their distinct Median lineage and language for generations.The "Dragon" Bloodline: In old Armenian and Iranian lore, Azhdahak translates to a mythical dragon or serpent (the multi-headed monster Azhi Dahaka). Because of this, Khorenatsi records that the surrounding people called this Median settlement the "descendants of the dragon."The Name Shift: Over 1,500 years of linguistic shifts, local dialects adapted this history. Shdankan, stems directly from this exact tradition of regional villages tracing their lineage back to the Median ruler (Azhdahak (rightarrow ) Shdahak (rightarrow ) Shdan).

( MOUNTAIN ARARAT IS KURDISH WITHOUT THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT )

The family of saladin ayyubi also comes from the village of ashdankan who traces back to the last median king, Renowned historians and orientalists—most notably Vladimir Minorsky—have documented that Saladin's family originated directly from the exact village of Ajdanakan (the historical variation of Ashdankan / Shdankan). Saladin’s grandfather, Shadhi ibn Marwan, belonged to the Rawadiya section of the powerful Hadhbani Kurdish tribal confederation. Historical records explicitly place their ancestral home in the village of Ajdanakan, situated near the ancient, prominent city of Dvin (in modern-day Armenia, right on the border of Nakhchivan/Azerbaijan).The Same Village: This Ajdanakan / Shdankan is the exact location recorded by Movses Khorenatsi 1,500 years ago as the sanctuary where the royal Median captives and descendants of the last Median King, Azhdahak (Astyages), were originally settled.The Bloodline Continuity: By tracing his family lineage back to this highly specific, legendary village, Saladin's Kurdish ancestral heritage loops cleanly back to the ancient elite Medes. Today it's called Azerbaijan purely because of politics and pan-turkism by the ottomans in may 28, 1918, azeris aren't even turkic by genetic, they were only assimilated to tukic identity by the seljuks and mongols who invaded those lands and it's specifically pointed out in the video by soran hamarash on how the people are only turkic by language and not DNA

( Most of the information is directly from soran hamarash however the resettlement of the royal medes to ararat was by me )

An old man died on the streets because of racism and our government keeps worshiping them.

Farhad sangawi also talks about how the turks kidnapped kurdish women for rape and how they had to contain their human shit in jars so when they came they covered themselves in it to live or not be kidnapped for rape, he also mentions how the ottomans brought women from Turkmenistan and sold them in hawler

the aryan identity was imposed on the Kurds from the outside not by their own choice but due to iranian(reza shah) policy, in 1935 nazi-linked scholars urged reza shah to push the aryan narrative and he agreed, renamed the country iran, declared it the land of the aryans and banned Kurdish and closed Kurdish schools.

logically there is no difference between saying 'i am turkish-turkiyeli', 'I am iranian' or 'I am aryan' today...all of them are assimilation projects, just like the model ataturrk adopted reza shah forcibly altered and assimilated the Kurds language and social structure through the taht-e Qapu law, intervening in their cultural existence through military oppression and massacres.

One example of linguistics being

The "Sunset" Meaning (The Sun + The West) HUR = Ancient root for Sun. LÊR / LÛ = Old root for West or leaning/falling. Hewlêr literally translates to "Sunset" or "The West" Or HUR = Short for the Hurrians, the ancient Bronze Age civilization deeply tied to Proto-Kurdish history. LÊR / LÊRE = The literal modern Sorani Kurdish word for "Here." Hewlêr translates to "The Hurrians were here" or "This is the Hurrian place."

For thousands of years, people have lived in the Zagros region. The Iranians (or Aryans) were not the original inhabitants of this area – they migrated from Central Asia into what is now called Iran at a later date. The label "Iranian Kurd" is a modern political term, not an ancient one. However, the Kurds as a distinct people, or their direct ancestors, have lived in the Zagros region for millennia.

Even before the Assyrians and Akkadians, populations ancestral to the Kurds inhabited parts of Mesopotamia and the Zagros mountains. Groups such as the Hurrians, Summerians, Gutians, Mitanni, Elamites, Medes, and Lullubi – all of whom had roots in the Zagros region – were present there. Some of these groups (particularly the Hurrians, Gutians, and Lullubi) lived in or near Mesopotamia before the rise of the Akkadian and Assyrian empires.

The Medes are almost certainly ancestors of the Kurds. One of the earliest and strongest supporters of this claim was the historian and orientalist Vladimir Minorsky, but before him, figures such as Rawlinson also hinted at it.

Much earlier in history, the name "Mede" was sometimes used synonymously with "Kurd." For example, Hayton of Corycus (13th century), describing the Ayyubids, wrote:

"After Arabs lost control of Egypt, the Medes—commonly called Cordins (Kurds)—took over Egypt.

The Hurrians are the most nuanced case. We generally do not have much knowledge of their language. Timeline: Hurrian was active from approximately 2300–1200 BCE in northern Mesopotamia, the western Zagros, and as far as the Taurus Mountains. This predates the appearance of the Medes in the Near East (9th century BCE) by centuries.

On the linguistic side, this is called a substratum (meaning "under layer"). Substrata in a language are often identified by words that do not have a clear origin within the language family to which that language belongs. In our case, that family is Iranian.

Kurdish has many such quirks. Look at words like دایک، پیاو، قوڕ – these are Kurdish words with no clear Iranian origin. They do not share similarity with other Iranian languages because none of them have these words.

We can therefore assume that these words are probably from Hurrian origin—or from whoever else inhabited the land before the Medes: the Gutians, Kassites, Lullubeans, Urartians, and many others.

Why can't kurdish be it's own catagory like aryan, semitic and so on? We're clearly ethnically different and our language isn't as impacted as other ones by the indo European migrations, if linguistically we can be classified as iranian or Indo-iraninan then Persian should be classified as semitic because is widely acknowledged that verb roots constitute the core richness of any language. Persian researchers themselves—most notably Dr. Mohsen Abolghasemi (دکتر محسن ابوقاسمی) in Tārīkh-e Bān-e Fārs (تاریخ بان فارس) and Mohammad Moqaddam (محمد مغدم) in Rāhnamā-ye Rīshe-ye Afʻāl-e Īrānī (راهنمای ریشة فعل های ایرانی) year 1340—have documented that the total number of verbal roots in Persian, including both living and obsolete forms, amounts to only 277.

In contrast, the Kurdish scholar Majid Mardoch Rohani (ماجید مەردۆخ ڕۆحانی) has identified 2,570 verbal roots in Kurdish. That is nearly ten times the Persian language

Despite that a Persian professor at the University of Tehran in philosophy major- tried to belittle muhammad kamal when he heard that he was writting in kurdish about Hegel and Nietzsche ( هگل و نیتچە ) and dismissively asked "is the kurdish language even rich enough for you to write in?"

Muhammad Kamal proposed translating a single philosophical sentence into both Persian and Kurdish. The professor offered:

Persian: "وجود خالص اصل وجد عینی است"

Kamal then gave the Kurdish equivalent:

Kurdish: "بوون، سەرچاوەی هەبووەکانە"

The Persian sentence contains five Arabic loanwords (وجود, خالص, اصل, وجد, عینی) and only one Persian element ( است). It is, lexically speaking, more Arabic than Persian. The Kurdish sentence, by contrast, is 100% native in its lexical stock. It expresses the same abstract philosophical concept—"Pure existence is the source of concrete being"

The Jews of the Republic of Mahabad (22 January–15 December 1946

The 11-month-long Republic of Mahabad was led by Qazi Muhammad, who came from a prominent family of chief Islamic judges (qazis) and religious leaders. President Qazi Muhammad met directly with Jewish community leaders, including Khidr-a Joo, promising full equality before the law and religious freedom. The administration also established a neighborhood security watch to protect Jewish residents from lawlessness and harassment. On 4th of March 1946 the republic's official newspaper, Kurdistan, reported that the Jewish community hosted a large festive gathering to honor President Qazi Muhammad and celebrate the republic's independence. The venue was decorated with colorful fabrics, and members of the republic's central committee and government attended the celebration.

The Jewish community also organized its political and social affairs through the Mahabad Jewish Association, which served as the official liaison between the Jewish population and the Kurdish government.

My questions are what do you think of qazi muhammad and his relations with the jews?, what do you think of the jews for the help and support for the republic of mahabad?

( Most of the information is directly from chawy kurd )

ZOROASTRIANISM

also called Mazdayasna and Behdin is a kurdish religion centred on the Avesta and the teachings of Zarathushtra Spitama, who is more commonly referred to by the Greek translation, Zoroaster (Ancient Greek: Ζωροάστρις, romanized: Zōroastris). Among the world's oldest organized faiths, its adherents exalt an uncreated, benevolent, and all-wise deity known as Ahura Mazda (Avestan: 𐬀𐬵𐬎𐬭𐬀⸱ 𐬨𐬀𐬰𐬛𐬁, lit. 'Lord of Wisdom'), who is hailed as the supreme being of the universe. In the foundational hymns of Zoroastrianism, the Gathas, the primary dualism is ethical and psychological rather than cosmic, centered on the choice between Asha (truth, order, and cosmic progress) and Druj (chaos, distortion, and the lie). Within this early theological framework, Ahura Mazda is the supreme, transcendent Creator who stands above the conflict. The direct opposition exists between the Twin Mentalities (Mainyu): Spenta Mainyu (the progressive, constructive spirit) and Angra Mainyu (the destructive, regressive spirit), both of whom exercised free will at the beginning of creation.

The concept of a strict, symmetrical cosmic dualism—wherein Angra Mainyu (Ahriman) is elevated to a co-equal, primordial adversary of Ahura Mazda himself, Furthermore, rather than predicting a passive apocalypse where God single-handedly destroys evil, the Gathas emphasize Frashokereti (the "making fresh" or renovation of the world), a collaborative, evolutionary process achieved through the progressive thoughts, words, and actions of humanity.

Opinions vary among scholars as to whether Zoroastrianism is monotheistic, polytheistic, henotheistic, or a combination of all three. Prominent modern Iranologists and linguists heavily reject the flat imposition of 'monotheism' on early Zoroastrianism. Prods Oktor Skjærvø explicitly excludes monotheism, admitting both ethical dualism and polytheism into the Gathic framework. Furthermore, Almut Hintze and Jean Kellens have documented how using Judeo-Christian parameters to label the faith creates a false, inadequate binary, masking the reality of a multi-divinity henotheistic system where other Gods (Yazatas) are naturally revered alongside the supreme Creator.

Originating from Zoroaster's reforms of the ancient Iranian religion, Zoroastrianism began during the Avestan period (possibly as early as the 2nd millennium BCE), but was first recorded in the mid-6th century BCE. For the following millennium, it was the official religion of successive Iranian polities, beginning with the Achaemenid Empire, which formalized and institutionalized many of its tenets and rituals, and ending with the kurdish Sasanian Empire, which revitalized the faith and standardized its teachings.

The central beliefs and practices of Zoroastrianism are contained in the Avesta, a compendium of sacred texts assembled over several centuries. Its oldest and most central component is the Gathas, purported to be the direct teachings of Zoroaster and his account of conversations with Ahura Mazda. These writings are part of a major section of the Avesta called the Yasna, which forms the core of Zoroastrian liturgy. Zoroaster's religious philosophy divided the early Iranian gods of Proto-Indo-Iranian paganism into emanations of the natural world—the ahura and the daeva; the former class consisting of divinities to be revered and the latter class consisting of divinities to be rejected and condemned. Zoroaster proclaimed that Ahura Mazda was the supreme creator and sustaining force of the universe, working in gētīg (the visible material realm) and mēnōg (the invisible spiritual and mental realm) through the Amesha Spenta, a class of seven divine entities that represent various aspects of the universe and the highest moral good. Emanating from Ahura Mazda is Spenta Mainyu (the Holy or Bountiful Spirit), the source of life and goodness, which is opposed by Angra Mainyu (the Destructive or Opposing Spirit), who is born from Aka Manah (evil thought).

Zoroastrian doctrine holds that, within this cosmic dichotomy, human beings have the choice between Asha ('truth', 'cosmic order'), the principle of righteousness or "rightness" that is promoted and embodied by Ahura Mazda, and Druj ('falsehood', 'deceit'), the essential nature of Angra Mainyu that expresses itself as greed, wrath, and envy. Thus, the central moral precepts of the religion are good thoughts (humata), good words (hukhta), and good deeds (huvarshta), which are recited in many prayers and ceremonies. Many of the practices and beliefs of ancient Iranian religion can still be seen in Zoroastrianism, such as reverence for nature and its elements, such as water (aban). Fire (atar) is held by Zoroastrians to be particularly sacred as a symbol of Ahura Mazda himself, serving as a focal point of many ceremonies and rituals, and serving as the basis for Zoroastrian places of worship, which are known as fire temples. ( Although the brith place of zoroaster is debated it's also believed he was born near lake urme of easter kurdistan )

Masud muhammad in his book called the kurdish language زمانی کوردی says zoroaster ( زەردەشت/zardasht ) Is the name his followers gave him and his real name zara-ta-ushatar-ai ( زەڕە-تا-وشەتەر-ئائی ), in the median language the words zara means gold, the word ta means glowing and shatar means striking or bright last the word ai means "coming" and until today in the hawrami dialect the word ( ama/ئاما ) means coming. The name means the **rise of the suns brightness**. The avesta language of the ancient kurds, the word zer ( زێڕ ) in avesta has still remained the same in modern kurdish as gold, ta ( تا ) has become taban ( تابان ), ushatar ( وشەتەر ) has become shawandin ( شەواندن ) meaning striking, ai ( ئائی ) has become ama ( ئاما ) in the hawrami dialect. The name of his parents are also mentioned in avesta in this line, oh zoroaster don't hurt any of "purushspa" and "dugudu"( ئەی زارا تۆشتەرە, زیان مەگەیەنە بە هیچ کام لە "پوروشسپە" و "دوغودو" ) the name of his father comes from purush ( پوروش ) and aspa or asp ( ئەسپا یان ئەسپ ) the name of horse has still remained the same in kurdish and some scholars say the name of his father means "the owner of old horse" while masud muhammad says it means "the owner of the white black bor" but neither have pointed out that purushspa was the mogi of yazdani, and has hold the title of pir ( پیر ) which is the highest level of religious statues in yarsani.

The 11-month-long Republic of Mahabad was led by Qazi Muhammad, who came from a prominent family of chief Islamic judges (qazis) and religious leaders. President Qazi Muhammad met directly with Jewish community leaders, including Khidr-a Joo, promising full equality before the law and religious freedom. The administration also established a neighborhood security watch to protect Jewish residents from lawlessness and harassment. On 4th of March 1946 the republic's official newspaper, Kurdistan, reported that the Jewish community hosted a large festive gathering to honor President Qazi Muhammad and celebrate the republic's independence. The venue was decorated with colorful fabrics, and members of the republic's central committee and government attended the celebration.

The Jewish community also organized its political and social affairs through the Mahabad Jewish Association, which served as the official liaison between the Jewish population and the Kurdish government.

( Most of the information is directly from chawy kurd )

I am aware that there were jews in kurdistan and lived here peacefully with the people and i also know that there are kurds in israel right now but what would be a common opinion on Kurds or what do you personally think about kurds? And what do you think about the situation is rojava? Did people protest for the kurds in israel when jolani got to power? Did people support kurds in rojava?

A kurdish idiom that goes like: go explain it to halaw comes from the time a jewish lady who was named halaw pinhas lived in the city of slemani and sold a variety of everyday household goods next to her own house and She was also community-minded. It is recorded that she donated 50 Iraqi King Faisal dinars—a significant sum at the time—to help build the local Faysaliyah school. Last but not least she had hearing problems and it's also said she was highly loved and respected by kurds from different religions and kurds would even bypass shops closer to their homes just to buy from her

The idiom is used when you don't want to listen to what somebody says ( as if saying I don't want to hear from you like halaw )

"And the curse of Allah is on the wrongdoers" (Quran 7:44).

Wrongdoers in the topic we'll be talking about are the oppressors of the kurds, oppression is wrong doing and allah curses those who are wrongdoers ( this means that those who oppress kurds have already been cursed by allah for wrongdoing and will eventually fall apart )

· Hadith (Sahih Muslim): "Keep away from injustice, for injustice near God is darkness on the Day of Judgement". Injustice is oppressing the freedom and religious/human rights of a group like kurds and on the oppression they do is injustice which is darkness to god in the day of judgement meaning those that oppress kurds will pay a heavy prise for their darkness

· Hadith (Sahih Muslim): Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) said: "A Muslim is the brother of a Muslim—he does not wrong him nor does he forsake him...". This hadith is a direct statement from the prophet saying you do not do your brother wrong, and by oppressing kurds they have already broken what the prophet had ordered upon us

· "For indeed, with hardship [will be] ease. Indeed, with hardship [will be] ease" (Quran 94:5-6). This is repeated twice to show the certainty of relief after hardship, kurds being oppressed and stripped away from their rights is hardship and relief is having a country meaning allah had promised kurds an independent kurdistan

· "Allah does not burden a soul beyond that it can bear" (Quran 2:286). The fact we kurds are oppressed is proof that our souls are stronger than the others

· Hadith (Abu Dawood): "If anyone constantly seeks pardon (from Allah), Allah will appoint for him a way out of every distress and a relief from every anxiety...". Distress and anxiety for kurds is not having a country, being oppressed, not being acknowledged as kurds, not being given their human rights and so on, by this if they keep seeing pardon from allah they will gain relief by what's going to relieved them ( that being a country and independence )

The prophet muhammad ( PBUH ) has said

1· "None of you truly believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself." (Bukhari, Muslim)

2· "A Muslim is the brother of a Muslim. He does not oppress him, nor abandon him, nor hand him over to an oppressor." (Bukhari, Muslim)

3· "Whoever among you sees an evil, let him change it with his hand. If he cannot, then with his tongue. If he cannot, then with his heart — and that is the weakest of faith." (Sahih Muslim)

4. "No adulterer is a believer at the time he is committing adultery, no thief is a believer at the time he is stealing; no drinker of wine is a believer at the time he is drinking it."

5. "Seeking knowledge is obligatory upon every Muslim"

For the first hadith:

This exact saying appears in multiple primary collections with slight variations in wording, all carrying the same meaning

Sahih al-Bukhari: Hadith 13 (Volume 1, Book 2, Hadith 6)

Sahih Muslim: Hadith 45 (Book 1, Hadith 72)

An-Nawawi's Forty Hadiths: Hadith 13

And according to him the ummah is an Islamic brotherhood and he also says this: "*A Muslim is a brother of another Muslim, so he should not oppress him, nor should he hand him over to an oppressor. Whoever fulfilled the needs of his brother, Allah will fulfill his needs...*" Sahih al-Bukhari 2442 | Sahih Muslim 2580

The Narrator: Abdullah ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with him)

So we're all brothers and our faith is not complete until we love for our Muslim brothers what we love for ourselves, this goes specially for the political leaders that oppose the existence of a kurdistan, you could argue that those in power are greedy and not justiful towards everyone but what about your normal muslim,why does he oppose a country called kurdistan even though if he doesn't support he's not a true believer

For the second hadith:

The people that oppress the kurds, such as the political leaders and government of syria, iraq, iran and turkey. By hadiths and demand from the prophet, they're not allowed to oppress the kurds or let someone else oppress them as they're classified as brothers and must protect each other from oppression

This hadith, narrated by Abdullah ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with him), appears in multiple major collections with consistent wording:

Collection Reference Full Text

Sahih al-Bukhari Book 46 (Oppressions), Hadith 3 (also 2442) "A Muslim is a brother of another Muslim, so he should not oppress him, nor should he hand him over to an oppressor. Whoever fulfilled the needs of his brother, Allah will fulfill his needs; whoever brought his (Muslim) brother out of discomfort, Allah will bring him out of the discomforts of the Day of Resurrection, and whoever screened a Muslim, Allah will screen him on the Day of Resurrection."

Sahih Muslim Book 45 (The Book of Virtue, Good Manners and Joining of the Ties of Relationship), Hadith 2580 (same text)

Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 3, Book 43, Hadith 622 (same text)

For the third Hadith:

People see how kurds are being oppressed and what happens to the kurds is indeed evil, evil things like oppression, genocide, ethnic cleansing, banning the kurdish language, treating them differently for being kurds and ect

Majority of people especially those that live in iraq, iran, syria and turkey are aware of this evil and they must act against it by stoping the evil with his hands ( this would specifically refer to the politicians ) but if he can't the with his tongue ( this refers to the normal citizen with no political power ) and if he is forcefully shut then in his heart he needs to support the kurdish cause and their desire for freedom and independence *HOWEVER* if you're capable of one of the first two things, youvmist do them, changing your heart is a last resort where you can't raise your voice or directly help them

This hadith, narrated by Abu Sa'eed al-Khudri, appears in at least three major primary collections:

Sahih Muslim Book 1 (Faith), Hadith 79 "Whoever among you sees an evil, let him change it with his hand; if he cannot, then with his tongue; if he cannot, then with his heart — and that is the weakest of faith."

Sunan an-Nasa'i Book 47 (The Book of Faith and its Signs), Hadith 5008 (same text)

40 Hadith of an-Nawawi Hadith 34 (same text)

this hadith (narrated again by Abdullah ibn Umar) proves that you need to oppose the government that opposes kurds, and the hadith goes like: "Each of you is a shepherd and each of you is responsible for his flock. The ruler who is over the people is a shepherd and is responsible for his flock; a man is a shepherd in charge of his household and he is responsible for his flock; a woman is a shepherdess in charge of her husband's house and children and she is responsible for them..."

Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 3, Book 46, Hadith 730

Sunan Abi Dawud Book 20 (Tribute, Spoils, Rulership), Hadith 2928

Al-Adab Al-Mufrad (Imam Bukhari) Hadith 212 & 214

For the fourht hadith:

It is obvious that the countries which occupy kurdistan have stolen the land and that is theft, the hadith says when the thief is committing theft, **at the moment he is doing the action of theft he is not a believer** now since they stole it they're not believers but not only at the time when they stole it, those countries are committing active theft which means the action of theft is still ongoing, by taking the land, they have stolen and by using the resources of the land they stole, it is active theft

Now since it's clear that the government of turkey, iraq, syria and iran are oppressing kurds and are committing active theft which classifies them as none believers and according to the second hadith, if you vote for those government and politicians who support that government, you're handing the kurds ( your muslim brothers ) to the oppressor who are committing active theft meaning you too have hand in active theft, meaning you're a none believer

Collection Specific Reference (Book & Hadith) Narrator Key Wording & Notes

Sahih al-Bukhari Book 46, Hadith 36 (2475) Abu Huraira "When an adulterer commits illegal sexual intercourse... when a thief steals... when a drinker drinks... when a robber robs..."

Sahih al-Bukhari Book 74, Hadith 4 (5578) Abu Huraira "...not a believer at the time of stealing/drinking/adultery." Includes addition about the robber.

Sahih Muslim Book 1, Hadith 109 (57a) Abu Huraira "...not a believer while committing..." Includes addition: "No plunderer... is a believer."

Sahih Muslim Book 1, Hadith 104 (Chapter 24) Abu Huraira Includes the crucial addition: "...but repentance may be accepted afterwards."

By those hadith the politicians need to help kurds gain independence and the people need to protest so that their government does give the kurds independence

For the fifth Hadith:

if a muslim doesn't know about the kurdish struggle they're not entitled to the opinion of kurds not deserving a country because they're ignorant of it and the prophet had made it obligated to seek knowledge, the kurdish struggle and desire for separation and achieving independence is indeed knowledge because if you look into it you'd understand why things are the way they're today, not knowing why kurds want independence and choosing to stay ignorant about it isn't ok and you're adviced by the prophet to not be like that

Source: Sunan Ibn Majah, Hadith 224

Narrator: Anas ibn Malik (may Allah be pleased with him)

Now I am not declaring takfir (excommunication) on any specific person — that judgment belongs to Allah alone. But the Prophet's words are clear

What is the justification behind saying kurds are iranian/aryan or rejecting it completely?