u/Mansur754

The prophet says: no one truly believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself

This exact saying appears in multiple primary collections with slight variations in wording, all carrying the same meaning

Sahih al-Bukhari: Hadith 13 (Volume 1, Book 2, Hadith 6)

Sahih Muslim: Hadith 45 (Book 1, Hadith 72)

An-Nawawi's Forty Hadiths: Hadith 13

And according to him the ummah is an Islamic brotherhood and he also says this: "A Muslim is a brother of another Muslim, so he should not oppress him, nor should he hand him over to an oppressor. Whoever fulfilled the needs of his brother, Allah will fulfill his needs..." Sahih al-Bukhari 2442 | Sahih Muslim 2580

The Narrator: Abdullah ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with him). \\\[1, 2, 3\\\]

So if we're all brothers and our faith is not complete until we love for our Muslim brothers what we love for ourselves, why are so many Muslims against the existence of a free kurdistan? On their own land, under the sharia law and an Islamic country. And this goes specially for the political leaders that oppose the existence of a kurdistan, you could argue that those in power are greedy and not justiful towards everyone but what about your normal muslim,why does he oppose an Islamic country called kurdistan even though if he doesn't support he's not full of faith

( I ask in genuine good faith and mean no negativity in any way towards anyone )

The prophet says: no one truly believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself

This exact saying appears in multiple primary collections with slight variations in wording, all carrying the same meaning

Sahih al-Bukhari: Hadith 13 (Volume 1, Book 2, Hadith 6)

Sahih Muslim: Hadith 45 (Book 1, Hadith 72)

An-Nawawi's Forty Hadiths: Hadith 13

And according to him the ummah is an Islamic brotherhood and he also says this: "A Muslim is a brother of another Muslim, so he should not oppress him, nor should he hand him over to an oppressor. Whoever fulfilled the needs of his brother, Allah will fulfill his needs..." Sahih al-Bukhari 2442 | Sahih Muslim 2580

The Narrator: Abdullah ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with him). \[1, 2, 3\]

So if we're all brothers and our faith is not complete until we love for our Muslim brothers what we love for ourselves, why are so many Muslims against the existence of a free kurdistan? On their own land, under the sharia law and an Islamic country. And this goes specially for the political leaders that oppose the existence of a kurdistan, you could argue that those in power are greedy and not justiful towards everyone but what about your normal muslim,why does he oppose an Islamic country called kurdistan even though if he doesn't support he's not full of faith

The prophet says: no one truly believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself

This exact saying appears in multiple primary collections with slight variations in wording, all carrying the same meaning

Sahih al-Bukhari: Hadith 13 (Volume 1, Book 2, Hadith 6)

Sahih Muslim: Hadith 45 (Book 1, Hadith 72)

An-Nawawi's Forty Hadiths: Hadith 13

And according to him the ummah is an Islamic brotherhood and he also says this: "A Muslim is a brother of another Muslim, so he should not oppress him, nor should he hand him over to an oppressor. Whoever fulfilled the needs of his brother, Allah will fulfill his needs..." Sahih al-Bukhari 2442 | Sahih Muslim 2580

The Narrator: Abdullah ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with him). \[1, 2, 3\]

So if we're all brothers and our faith is not complete until we love for our Muslim brothers what we love for ourselves, why are so many Muslims against the existence of a free kurdistan? On their own land, under the sharia law and an Islamic country. And this goes specially for the political leaders that oppose the existence of a kurdistan, you could argue that those in power are greedy and not justiful towards everyone but what about your normal muslim,why does he oppose an Islamic country called kurdistan even though if he doesn't support he's not full of faith

If the balls still exist and the male is well aged to his teenage years, will his body be able to naturally reproduce testosterone after the balls have surgically been brought down to the right spot and matured over time?

If the balls still exist and the male is well aged to his teenage years, will his body be able to naturally reproduce testosterone after the balls have surgically been brought down to the right spot and matured over time?

Since neither goku or vegeta can use each others ultimate transformations like TUI/EU and neither were good against black frieza, vegito is what's needed

For EU you need to be aggressive and for MUI you need to be calm, but with TUI you can combine emotions and other transformations to it, and that's where vegito comes into play. We know that if two people can't reach a certain point alone, as long as they fuse they're able to reach that certain point even if they themselves can never do so ( as seen with goten and trunks not being able to transform to ssj2 but gotenks can go even further with ssj3 )

Vegito can't combine MUI and EU because the fundamentals and the requirements for those transformations are the complete opposites of each other, but since vegito will have both transformations since they're goku and vegeta's powers he can use EU while combining it with TUI

If he were to combine them it won't take a strong toll on his body since he doesn't just get made out of thin air, the potara earnings stack the power of those that fuse and if they're rivals they'll get the rival boost, goku/vegeta can't even use both techniques separately let alone combining them, they'll probably die of fatigue if they do so but vegito is formed from both of them, the same two bodies that are used to ( partially ) using TUI and EU separately, meaning vegito has a body that's used to using both of them, and from the rival boost is should be more than enough to maintain the combination

Cyrus the Great was traditionally said to be the son of the Persian ruler Cambyses I and Mandane, who in Greek accounts was the daughter of Astyages, making Cyrus half Median through his mother and tied to both royal houses. His paternal grandfather was Cyrus I, an earlier Persian king, while his paternal line belonged to the Achaemenid dynasty that later Persian kings traced back to Achaemenes. However, some modern historians think the story linking Cyrus to Astyages may have been partly political propaganda created to legitimize his rule over the Medes after he overthrew them.

Herodotus (5th century BCE) — In his work Histories, he says Cyrus was the son of Cambyses I and Mandane, daughter of Astyages. He presents Cyrus as both Persian and connected to the Median royal family. Herodotus also describes Astyages having prophetic dreams about Cyrus before Cyrus eventually overthrows him.

Xenophon (4th century BCE) — In Cyropaedia, Xenophon portrays Cyrus as an ideal ruler educated partly among the Medes. His work is more philosophical and moralizing than strictly historical, but it strongly emphasizes Cyrus’ familiarity with Median court culture.

Ctesias (5th–4th century BCE) — He served at the Persian court and wrote Persica. His version differs from Herodotus in many details and sometimes portrays Cyrus with less noble origins. Much of his work survives only in fragments quoted by later authors.

Strabo (1st century BCE–1st century CE) — He discusses the Persians and Medes generally and repeats traditions about Cyrus and the early empire.

Plutarch (1st–2nd century CE) — In works like Life of Artaxerxes, he refers back to stories about Cyrus and the Persian royal tradition.

Arrian (2nd century CE) — Mainly focused on Alexander the Great, but he discusses Cyrus as the founder of the Persian Empire and mentions how later Persians honored him.

Herodotus (5th century BCE) — In Histories, he frequently speaks of “Medes and Persians” together, and sometimes simply says “Medes” when referring to forces or subjects of the Persian Empire. He knew Persians and Medes were distinct peoples, but Greek language often treated “Mede” as a broader imperial term.

Aeschylus (5th century BCE) — In the play Persians, written shortly after the Greco-Persian Wars, Greeks still use “Mede” poetically and politically for the invading imperial forces. Terms like “Median army” appear even though the ruling dynasty was Persian.

Thucydides (5th century BCE) — Sometimes uses “the Mede” almost as shorthand for the Persian king or Persian imperial power.

Xenophon (4th century BCE) — Distinguishes Medes and Persians more clearly than some earlier authors, but still portrays the empire as heavily shaped by Median customs.

Was more in touch with his median royal blood? Or was he even median?

The prophet says: no one truly believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself

This exact saying appears in multiple primary collections with slight variations in wording, all carrying the same meaning

Sahih al-Bukhari: Hadith 13 (Volume 1, Book 2, Hadith 6)

Sahih Muslim: Hadith 45 (Book 1, Hadith 72)

An-Nawawi's Forty Hadiths: Hadith 13

And according to him the ummah is an Islamic brotherhood and he also says this: "A Muslim is a brother of another Muslim, so he should not oppress him, nor should he hand him over to an oppressor. Whoever fulfilled the needs of his brother, Allah will fulfill his needs..." Sahih al-Bukhari 2442 | Sahih Muslim 2580

The Narrator: Abdullah ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with him). [1, 2, 3]

So if we're all brothers and our faith is not complete until we love for our Muslim brothers what we love for ourselves, why are so many Muslims against the existence of a free kurdistan? On their own land, under the sharia law and an Islamic country. And this goes specially for the political leaders that oppose the existence of a kurdistan, you could argue that those in power are greedy and not justiful towards everyone but what about your normal muslim,why does he oppose an Islamic country called kurdistan even though if he doesn't support he's not full of faith

Let me address that i am a muslim too and I'm seeking guidance and help from those that are more educated than me in a religious topic regarding islam, and human sympathy in general to those that are not muslims

In the QURAN which is the word of god ( allah ) not his prophet or anything else, says “So whoever has assaulted you, then assault him in the same way that he has assaulted you. And fear Allah and know that Allah is with those who fear Him" in Surah Al-Baqarah (2:194).

Here is the arabic: فَمَنِ ٱعۡتَدَىٰ عَلَيۡكُمۡ فَٱعۡتَدُواْ عَلَيۡهِ بِمِثۡلِ مَا ٱعۡتَدَىٰ عَلَيۡكُمۡ ۚ وَٱتَّقُواْ ٱللَّهَ وَٱعۡلَمُوٓاْ أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ مَعَ ٱلۡمُتَّقِينَ

Here is the definition of assault: Assault means a physical attack or a threat of harm directed at someone

And assault can be, physical, verbal, military, sexual and ect

Kurds have always faced all kinds of assault especially military and verbal

. Military assault would be like the chemical attack on halabja

. Verbal assault would be cuss/swear words or threatening violence

So by the logic of the QURAN we should do this stuff to them ( at least to my understanding and i could be COMPLETELY WRONG so I'd like to be corrected ) ir at the very least not let them live among us, they want to come and live in the KRG because where they live people are not respectful and they discriminate against them, and they have the audacity to come and live here even though they REFUSE TO LEARN THE LANGUAGE ( KURDISH ) they have banned our language and you're not allowed to speak it on places controlled by them but suddenly they want to live with us even though theh discriminant against us on a day to day basis, countless kurdish youngsters and teenager are not capable of finding jobs because they work at them and they refuse to use our language, so many instances where you won't be served food or welcomed unless you spoke Arabic IN THE KRG but if you do that in basra or Baghdad they'll close your work place

In conclusion: my question as simple as possible would be, we shouldn't allow them to live with us because islam supports the idea of us not living with them and even if we're too civilized to not do the horrible crimes like they did, we at the very least should reject coexistence with them

( And if my POV is wrong in any way,then please correct me ❤️)

I always get the feeling that no matter what war is in the middle east the kurds will suffer more than anyone

Kagurabachi is a manga that's been going on for 3 years and it's anime has been highly anticipated through out the years

The flair would be to know the difference when talking about fiction just as the purpose of any other flair

View Poll