u/ayowatchyojetbruh

I tried asking Google or looking for other posts but I keep getting other cases where this may have been used as a side argument or perhaps implied.

What im asking is if theres anyone out there in the past that has actually tried to make this main anchor point for their defense

Its not just Tom Holland who supports this idea but other historians have pointed this out and the conversation remains divided. Personally, the argument that Nero would have started the fire intentionally so that he could grab more of the city area for himself is just ridiculous. After the fire Nero had to not only empty the coffers completely in the process of building his new palace but also Rome, he also had to raise massive taxes on the whole empire for it which incidentally caused the provincial rebellions and eventual rebellions by Galba. Even the praetorian guard abandoned him when they realized he had no money left.

So if his intention had been as vane as that it would have been quite a lot more cheaper to simply purchase the land from the people he wanted to and build a luxurious palace. His predecessors had already in fact enlarged and built grander sections in the palatine hill with merely portions of the treasury. The fire Rome indeed caused Nero downfall because Nero had an impulsive and stubborn personality to not listen to advice and rather than rebuild Rome slowly with the amount of money he had, he decided to raise taxes which caused the rebellion and financial crisis.

Ive heard so much about this production throughout the years and seen several clips on YouTube but there doesnt seem to be any place at all where I can purchase the DVD or stream it. I see people in this subreddit that claim to have watched it before so where did you watch it?

I tried asking this hypothetical question on Google and also AI but they keep giving me contradicting answers.

Would the person that arrests the probable culprit face charges for arresting the other person? And if so would they need to prove probable cause, meaning the reason why they tried to arrest the person?

Would the arrested person have the option to file a civil lawsuit? Would the law be the one filing a criminal case? How would that work?

If the employer fired you in the spot after they said all they had to say. Could an employee hypothetically claim that they were wrongfully terminated for something that didnt happen on work hours, nor is it related to their job at the moment nor did it happen to an employee since they were a costumer at the time?

And before you guys answer im well aware of Agent Ratliff and Occupational Care Diversity Affairs company where they come to your work and do this😂 this just a hypothetical

It would be nice if they gave the player base some heads up news more often. The 0.4 update news were terrible like they literally went way past the 6 month gap into 7 months and a half before they finally admitted that it would take them 1 year.

​

Before the comments begin, im not saying that they have to release every 6 months. What im saying is, share more information and timelines with the playerbase instead of keeping people in the dark like they unquestionably did in 0.4

The worst part is that you be waiting it out for the loot to respawn and then someone else shows up to also loot. Theres simply too many people crammed into one server. Either that or reduce the spawn time for loot

Supposing that you have whichever red dot/scope and whichever grip, butstock, modification that you prefer and the weapon is optimized to use it as your regular weapon, which one is the best? ( not for snipping use, read the post or I will call you out on it)

View Poll

I feel like this game hates the Dutch and Portuguese because it forces you to conquer a lot of land in order for trade to be possible. Thats not historically what the Dutch and Portuguese did, they only would settle small forts and towns along the African coast and the trade hop to Asia. But the game is forcing you to have to colonize a whole province, not just this but its completely at random. It doesnt make any sense that the settlers are first building a settlement deep in the Kongo river first and completely ignoring the coast, thats not how that works. Why isnt this being fixed?