u/koola_00

I was reading a post about how Edward's departure from the new sequel was seen as not a good thing, as the main problem with Rebirth was the script, rather than the directing. Honestly, I agree. But that post was an interesting comment that made me think:

>That being said, Koepp, in my opinion, is burned out. It's not like he didn't say that he had no idea where to take it from Dominion, which was divisive on It's own to put it lightly. Koepp's script was weak.. very weak.. but Edwards direction was also an uninspired train wreck of mediocrity.

>So, that leaves one important thing that most fans do not want to acknowledge.

>Spielberg is destroying the franchise that he built. Like Ridley Scott with the Alien prequels and George Lucas.. being George Lucas, Spielberg out stayed hus welcome and has signed off on EVERY idea of this franchise. Even the real bad ones.

While I disagree with Edwards' directing being mediocre, I do agree that Koepp, and by extension, the franchise, feels a bit burned out. Dude didn't know where else to go after Dominion, and according to him, the team was struggling to find a way to expand the franchise in a scientifically, realistically believable way!

I feel like part of this is because he, and by extension, Universal, want to stick to what they know best: sticking to small, isolated settings. Everything else be damned.

Honestly, as much as people love the idea of having the setting be in an isolated environment, I don't think staying in such an environment would work in the long run. Almost ALL of the films have done something like this. The only ones who haven't are Fallen Kingdom and the first 2/3rds of Dominion. Sure, those movies weren't of any good quality, but I still find myself drawn more to those films because, at that point, after 4 films of being on an island, the films taking place in a mansion and in areas like the Sierra Nevada area and Malta are something I remember more clearly because, writing notwithstanding, they feel different.

I get it, the smartest decision is for them to not make more movies, but let's face it: we all know Universal. More movies with dinosaurs = more money. But I figured if they're gonna make more, they should move away from the mystery survival and explore other genres: mystery, horror (they never really explain horror, to be honest), or even try action again, but NOT as big or nonsensical as the previous films. I think action CAN work!

That's my hot take on this. I don't hate these movies: I just want these movies to be better and not stagnate.

I remember back when FNAF World first came out, and people were very divided, to say the least. Honestly, when I looked at it, I never understood why: it looked like a fun RPG side game.

But now...everyone looks back at FNAF World fondly, and with the new teasers confirming a FNAF World 2 as well as a SB sequel (looking forward to THAT one), I'd like to know;

When did we as a fanbase start loving FNAF World, and why?

A bit of a stupid question, perhaps, but I'm genuinely curious:

I've always had a bit of a thing for sound designs, and one of the things I've liked about certain vampire movies like Van Helsing (2004) and several others is the sound designs of the vampires' roars and snarls.

How do you think movies like these make those sounds? I know parts of it are from the actors themselves, but do they also use animal or other types of sounds? I think it's cool and emphasizes the inhumanity of these monsters, something I want to replicate for my story!!

Now, before I explain, I just want to say: I love the Muldoon's Logs series. I think it's an intense, informative, and overall cool series! But...there are some things I have a few problems with.

The main one I have is...with so many casualties shown throughout the series, I'm surprised that InGen hasn't really stepped in and put a halt to it. I suppose they could afford to cover these up, and it was only up until Jophery's death that they started to take it seriously. Yeah, I know it's an AU, but still!

It's one of my few gripes I have with this otherwise great series!

In case anyone gets confused, her Pre-Crisis origin is akin to her origin in the new Supergirl movie: born after Krypton's destruction and left Argo City.

Personally, I like her Post-Crisis origin more. Having her be, chronologically at least, older than Superman and supposed to protect him before her ship got diverted, lost in space, or trapped in the Phantom Zone, left her going to Earth when Superman is an adult...there's a sense of tragedy to that, and I like it!

What about you guys?

At this point, we all know the upcoming FNAF 3 movie has a new writer, one with a hit-or-miss but decent track record (LOVE the It movies), showing that, as much as I despise the FNAF 2 toxic posivity/toxic negativity discourse that came from that, as some users like myself have already pointed out, there IS a silver lining to all of that, and there's a good chance the movie will be much better than FNAF 2 at least.

But I have a couple of concerns about this movie. The first is: with Scott no longer one of the writers (so far), how much of his original vision will be followed? While I'm not big on the writing, especially the dialogue, I think the story is still interesting.

The 2nd and BIGGEST concern, and the reason I'm making this post, is that the upcoming movie will be better, but also boring. As much as I like the new Supergirl movie, if there's one thing that movie taught me... it's that people are not forgiving towards movies that are boring, regardless of whether the writing quality is good or not. Say what you will about FNAF 2, but there are some things to laugh at, whether intentional or unintentional. Even the first film has some moments like that.

I know, I know: it's too early to tell, but I feel like they might take the wrong lessons from the criticisms given from FNAF 2 and try too hard to be scary or serious. And honestly...I feel like that's not entirely what FNAF is. It's more like a Goosebumps type of horror, and that's what makes it as a franchise unique in my opinion.

But what about you guys? Do you agree/disagree? And bonus question: what are your concerns?

Honestly, I didnt think he'd actually see it or the first one. But overall, he finds it okay.

From his FNAF 2 redemption stream.

I'm writing my first Marvel fanfiction, and it involves Captain Marvel. I have been looking into some comics about her, but I would also like some help in getting her personalty down.

How would you all describe Captain Marvel's personality?