u/Thick-Cable1822

What's the music track in the intro? I've heard it elsewhere so many times now. This show usually sources from Epidemic Sound if that helps.

I found a video on YouTube about declining birth rates in SK, and it ended with a quote basically saying that if women are given the choice to go to work or stay home, most would choose to go to work. This was used as a "gotcha" of sorts, but I'm confused as to the point they're trying to make. While I understand that shaming women for wanting to stay home is wrong (I hope most feminists are that insane), the quote seemed to imply that restricting women's choice to work was both beneficial and necessary. The video also had lots of arguments about wages falling due to increased supply, but I feel like those arguments are more damning of capitalism if anything. Thoughts?

To get my opinion out of the way first, if there will be a new protagonist, they would be the fifth, since none of the current four show any signs of quitting. However, I’m not sure the story would work quite as well with five perspectives. It would also get harder to keep track of everything that is happening.

On the other hand, a fifth protagonist provides more opportunities for protagonist to meet each other. Currently, most interactions between protagonists are quite short and each story is largely self-contained. I think it would be cool if we get the perspective of one protagonist, then get a whole new perspective with a different protagonist’s point of view that acts as a form of dramatic irony. This could also show a protagonist getting manipulated without knowing it.

What do you think?

Trying to ask this on a more specific subreddit to see if I can get more answers.

Question: What entails virtue signalling and why does it mean people think you’re a bad person?

Tried r/explainlikeimfive, r/NoStupidQuestions, and r/AskReddit already. Where else can I try posting this?

https://preview.redd.it/hfvudtmrr4ih1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=d39539ababd0f4f0975c2df09390d20bc6a97c91

Gave Fear Mongerer some Pumpkin, then left to my island to get more crops. Fear Mongerer was back in the back of line when I got back.

How often does this happen?

Basic premise: my protagonist has an ability/curse that means they can return from the dead. However, I'm stuck between two negatives when they return.

1. The protagonist cannot remember anything, and must try to repiece their life/start a new one.

2. No one else can remember them, and anything the protagonist left behind is treated with confusion.

The protagonist will revive after some time has passed, in a different location each time. Which do you think would befit the story better?

As far as I am aware, I am neurotypical, but I keep finding autistic advice/experience videos and weirdly relating to them. Does this mean I may actually be autistic or is this a normal thing for neurotypicals to do? I am somehat introverted which may be why I relate, but is that the sole reason?

As far as I am aware, I am neurotypical, but I keep finding autistic advice/experience videos and weirdly relating to them. Does this mean I may actually be autistic or is this a normal thing for neurotypicals to do? I am somehat introverted which may be why I relate, but is that the sole reason?

Probably at a different level, but could something similar work in Daggerheart? I would say that numerical increases would be banned past the threshold level, but some subclass features and homebrewed "feats" would be fair game.

Thoughts?

I recently came across this, and seems pretty accurate to my experience, but also not? Like I make storylines up in my head all the time and space out and pace about because of it, but I just assumed my creative brain was just running on overdrive. It just seemed like how people make OCs, except mine never leave my head.

I'm not neurodivergent as far as I know: I can sit still and do things usually, but the bits I read about the music (I listen quite a lot) and the impairment (only to an extent, occassionally forget to pack bags and upcoming events, stuff like that) seem like shocking accurate.

This isn't the first time I've related to a disability I don't have: I questioned whether I was neurodivergent for quite a bit. It's always been the case in the past that my symptoms just aren't quite extreme enough for me to have that disability, and I fear that might be the case here, but there's no harm in asking, I suppose. Am I barking up the wrong tree?