▲ 100 r/printSF

What are sci-fi writers who have unusual worldviews(and it shows in their works)?

So I love reading writers who have unusual worldviews. Among science fiction I can think of 2 writers like these

Philip K. Dick with his paranoia mixed with spiritual psychosis.

Olaf Stapledon with his cosmic philosophy influenced by Spinoza and mixed with transhumanism.

In both of them their worldviews are of major influence on their writing. What are other examples of this?

reddit.com
u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 14 days ago

Why all the long-living animals are aquatic?

If you look at the species who live hundreds of years like turtles, greenland sharks, bowhead whales, red sea urchin etc. They're all aquatic, among the terrestrial animals humans are already at the peak of possible lifespan, elephants have roughly the same lifespans as us and there's no species that live longer apart from tortoise. Why animals that can potentially live 200+ years happened to exist only in sea?

reddit.com
u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 17 days ago

Why Soga no Kurayamada no Ishikawa no Maro had such a long name?

I've never seen anyone else in Japanese history having even close to this long of a name. Usually they all had "Personal name" + no + "Clan name". Soga no Kurayamada no Ishikawa no Maro having a long full name is unusual and he wasn't even that important compared to other aristocrats so I'm curious.

reddit.com
u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 28 days ago

Why clan Nakatomi wasn't suppressed by Soga like how Mononobe was after the defeat at the Battle of Mount Shigi?

After the Battle of Mount Shigi the clan Mononobe ceased to exist with all it's members being either dead or changing their surnames and fading in obscurity. Meanwhile clan Nakatomi despite being their main ally seemingly didn't suffer much and only 58 years later(a short time from the point of history and traditional societies) had their comeback with Nakatomi no Kamatari(later known as Fujiwara no Kamatari) being one of the two chief masterminds behind the Isshi incident which overthrew and destroyed clan Soga.

I know that Nakatomi were a priestly clan unlike the Mononobe which were a military clan. This explains why they didn't suffer losses at the Battle of Mount Shigi but why Soga didn't bother suppressing them despite their power? Were they afraid that destroying a priest family is a bad optics and would bring discord among the governed people and clans?

reddit.com
u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 1 month ago

Crazy masochists who get sexual pleasure from absolutely all pain, you can't harm them because they transform all the suffering into pleasure. Extreme masochism as an undefeatable superpower.

1: Darkness from Konosuba. She's a heavy knight tank who seemingly is a brave hero but actually fights because she gets pleasure when taking damage from monsters and also has fantasies about getting raped by monsters. She also loves getting verbally humiliated and purposefully dates broke, ugly, perverted men who objectify her. The only things that she suffers from is being perceived as cute or wearing cute clothes and getting comments about her weight or muscles

2: Decadus from Drakengard 3. He's the only happy character in the entire game and possibly in the whole Yoko Taro verse. There's absolutely no suffering that doesn't bring him pleasure, he gets pleasure even when sand gets into his eyes when walking through a desert. His mistress Intoner Four tries to punish him by not beating him but being denied beating that brings suffering and thus pleasure is a suffering on it's own and so he gets off when he gets denied suffering as well. He also never cums, with Intoner Four he instead watched how she jerked off all night long in her bed, with Intoner Zero when she asked him to have sex with her he refused her.

u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 2 months ago

Elephants can drink up to 200 litres of water per day, if I were to give an elephant 200 litres of beer would it enjoy beer much more due to being able to drink so much of it at once or would there be no difference due to his big size?

I've just been thinking, like is 1 litre of beer for elephant is too small to be noticed and an equivalent of 10 ml for human(I'm only talking only about pleasure, not physiology). So like if I drink 1 litre of beer an elephant should drink 100 litres of beer to feel the same pleasure that I've felt or would his pleasure be 100 times stronger due to being able to consume so much of it?

reddit.com
u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 2 months ago
▲ 0 r/CRPG

RPG that have a pure evil path where you kill absolutely everyone?

I struggle with violent urges and so I play RPGs(the only genre of games I play) as a stress relief from them. I always play the most evil way possible but noticed that many games try to make the evil path something more morally grey instead of an insane murder hobo and I hate it because it makes the game less relatable to me. Or other problems like being forced to do good choices or evil path being censored. So what are some good games where you can play as an absolute apocalyptic evil without any ambiguity?

reddit.com
u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 2 months ago

Books like Lazarillo de Tormes? Amoral brutal survival in a society without moralizing, love, philosophy or sentimentality to it.

I really love Lazarillo de Tormes, it's so straight to the point and it makes it feel so real, honest and primal. No moral judgements, no "woe is me", no sentimental messages about love or something like that, no character development or exploration of the "inner world". Just a homeless young guy who uses street smarts to survive at any cost in our brutal world by scamming everyone.

reddit.com
u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 2 months ago
▲ 140 r/typemoon

Kara no Kyoukai misinterprets Buddhism

So I know that these are nitpicks but at the ending of Paradox Spiral, Touka Aozaki says this to Araya Souren:

"A psychologist has defined what's called mass unconsciousness. It suggests that at the bottom of human consciousness all leads to the same well. It's where all the egoism of the entire world is supposedly stored. It's called Araya-shiki in Buddhism. What an ironic paradox of the world. Your name and the name of the one you despise make up a profound word"

"A psychologist" obviously refers to Carl Jung and I admit that I don't know much about him but from what I know of him this description fits his ideas, but it can't be applied to Buddhism.

Buddhist philosophy is very complicated and can't be explained in a reddit post but I'll try explaining this part. Araya-shiki is a Japanese term for ālāya-vijñāna, the eighth consciousness and the fundamental storehouse consciousness of the eight consciousnesses. The Eight Consciousnesses of a "person" is the subject of the Yogācāra school of philosophy of Mahayana Buddhism.

First of all ālāya-vijñāna is not where the egoism is stored. The "egoism" is stored in kliṣṭa-manas, the seventh consciousnesses and is called "the defiled mentality". It's the consciousness that is responsible for the primordial ignorance and the suffering of all living beings, where the four poisons of self-view, self-delusion, self-conceit, and self-love arise. How does it happen? Because it mistakes ālāya-vijñāna for a "self".

Buddhism asserts a non-self, that people ultimately have no real Identity. How does the false belief in identity generates? Ālāya-vijñāna(Araya-shiki) by itself is neutral, neither positive or negative. It's both the mind and the world, the mind and the world are in a complex codependency but constitute for a person a mere awareness of the objects presence. It's where the karma(causality) is stored.

A non-enlightened person thinks that they're a self because they don't recognize that they're just causes and conditions, these causes and conditions are constantly changing and are disparate, they do not constitute a self. They belief that they're a person who makes choices, experiences pleasure or suffering from something, that they were born and that they die(Buddhism believes that a person never dies because they were never truly born in the first place). In truth it's all just the essenceless conditions playing out based on causality.

Kliṣṭa-manas mistakes these conditions(ālāya-vijñāna) for a self. The defiled processes of kliṣṭa-manas are present even during sleep and have existed since the beginningless time, without even a moment it having stopped. So araya-shiki is really not where the "egoism of the entire world" is stored.

Yes, It's called a storehouse consciousness because it's from what all the other consciousness arise and you can indeed say that it's where the egoism is thus stored, the wording is still not good. Particularly because ālāya-vijñāna can be present even when self-view is removed, that's why an enlightened person doesn't immediately dematerialize into parinirvana/dharmakaya(Buddhahood), because even though they removed the ignorance of self-existence, they just stopped creating new karma. The old karma(currently existing body) from before the enlightenment remains and needs to be played out.

Another inaccurate word is "unconsciousness". For ālāya-vijñāna is an equal cause of both conscious and unconscious thinking. It is kliṣṭa-manas that can be called unconscious because it's so subtle that beings have it even in a dreamless sleep.

Another inaccurate words are "mass unconsciousness" and "same well". It implies that different ālāya-vijñānas constitute a unity between them when they do not. Buddhism actually rejects all the views of "oneness" and "unity" in equal measure to it's rejection of the concepts of self-existence. It's what makes it different from Hinduism which believes in oneness, Buddhism believes in a non-conceptual emptiness instead(I believe that's from where the original Japanese title of Kara no Kyoukai "The Boundary of Emptiness" comes from).

Ālāya-vijñānas are influencing each other and do not a constitute a self but when Buddhism speaks of them conventionally, Buddhism speaks of them being separate. Humans have very similar ālāya-vijñāna to each other, which is why we were "born" as humans in the first place in this particular universe, realm, place and time but it's just a convergence of conditions of different ālāya-vijñānas. After death each ālāya-vijñāna(person) will go in their separate ways to different realms/modes of existence, there was no unity between them, just wanderers in Samsara stopping in the same town. There are differences in ālāya-vijñāna even in "this life", an American businessman and an Indian housewife have a radically different worldviews and emotions, these differences are due to ālāya-vijñāna. The qualities of the mind simply correspond to it's realm but are also decided by the world itself with realm only as a supporting condition for the change, and so they change and with them different realms become to exist.

Touko would've been more accurate if she said Mana-Shiki(the Japanese term for kliṣṭa-manas) instead of Araya-Shiki but yeah using the name combination of MC and the Villain was very cool.

Edit: I've read the original novel by Nasu and this is one thing that was made worse by adaptation. In the original dialogue there's a focus on Araya being a Buddhist monk but didn't noticing that the nature all non-enlightened beings(the same ignorance) is the same beyond the conventional distinctions and he behaved just like them, which makes it have more sense though still technically wrong.

u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 2 months ago

The reason why I've played FFXIII is because "Lightning Returns " is a very cool title when you don't know that Lightning is a character.

I don't remember where I've seen this title but I immediately got intrigued because Lightning Returns sounds very mysterious, badass and unusual when you don't know that Lightning refers to a character here. Like what lightning? Why it dissapeared and why it returned? Lightning returning sounds epic. I knew absolutely nothing about jrpg and final fantasy back then because very few people play them in my region and so I was intrigued and kept thinking about this title, learnt that it's the third game in the trilogy, looked up gameplay and visuals of the first one and I've liked it, bought it and enjoyed it. Was a bit disappointed learning that Lightning just referred to a character.

reddit.com
u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 2 months ago

I mourn the decline of popularity of comically hypermasculine manga/anime where most male characters look like musclehead gorillas (jojo, Baki, kenshin ashura, fist of the north star)

No misogyny but I'm lowk gay and love hypermasculine men and I'm myself pretty masculine(I work as a truck mechanic) but I love to submit to men who are stronger than me. Anyways I don't really like anime and manga but I always liked this specific genre of insane battle manga where the focus isn't on underage cute waifus but on screaming roided men who crash everything and end up in insane and comical situations afterwards. There's no Western alternative to this genre or anywhere else, it's unique. The Western action movies about badass men are all live-action so they all have very limited physiques. The only videogames about roided insane men are fighting games without much plot. There are books about them like Conan but books are without pictures of their physiques.

So I've noticed that this genre of manga/anime about roided men have seriously died out. Manga/anime male main characters all are very slim and calm nowadays. Same for most other male characters and this specific genre of manga have stopped getting new titles. Even Jojo seriously toned down the musclehead and I hate it very much.

reddit.com
u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 2 months ago

TIL about Bekeranta, a 19th century community of indigenous Americans in British Guyana which was led by a man who claimed that he would turn them white by using a supernatural power. 400 people committed mass suicide after he said that they would resurrect as white people after killing themselves.

en.wikipedia.org
u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 2 months ago

My classification of all the 31 notable philosophers of pessimism in groups

Psychological Pessimism

Anthropocentric pessimism centered on the analysis of human psyche and it's contradictions. Core theme - suffering is the fundamental(base) state of human psyche due to mortality, meaninglessness, impermanence and desires. Human beings are in constant struggle to suppress this inherent knowledge.

Peter Zapffe

Ernest Becker

Herman Tønnessen

Miguel de Unamuno

Albert Caraco

Higesias

Schopenhaueran Pessimism

A tightly related group of 19th century German Idealist pessimists. Influenced by Kantian idealism and Ancient Indian Philosophy. Headed by Arthur Schopenhauer. Is very technically complex and concerns itself with the idea of the metaphysical Will.

Arthur Schopenhauer

Eduard von Hartmann

Phillip Mainlander

Olga Plümacher

Agnes Taubert

Poetic(Aesthetical) Pessimism

Philosophical pessimist ideas presented in poetical or aphoristic forms. Less technical than the others as it aims to explain truth through aesthetics and personal meditations

Al Ma'Ari

Omar Khayam

Giacomo Leopardi

Thomas Ligotti

Emil Cioran

Heroic Pessimism

Pessimism that empathizes personal struggle and agency in the face of the meaningless or a hostile world.

Albert Camus

Friedrich Nietzsche

Drew M. Dalton

Hegelian-Schopenhaueran Pessimism

Pessimism that combines the Schopenhaueran ideas with Hegelian ideas, instead of opposing Hegel like the Schopenhaueran group.

Carlo Michelstaedter

Julius Bahnsen

Quietist Pessimism

Pessimism that concerns itself with the limitations of human knowledge and action. Empathizes the futility of action and the false nature of knowledge in the face of ultimately unknowable reality.

Eugene Thacker

David E. Cooper

Christian Pessimism

Teleological pessimism that empathizes the inherent suffering of the observable world and it's relation to the Divine.

Blaise Pascal

Baltasar Gracián

Negative Utilitarian Pessimism

Pessimism that concerns itself with the assymetry between pleasure and suffering. Core theme: the absence of pleasure is simply not bad, while the absence of suffering is good. Therefore coming into existence is always a harm.

David Benatar

Julio Cabrera

Transcendent(Buddhist) Pessimism

Pessimism that centres on the direct non-conceptual insight into the reality of unsatisfactoriness of all conditioned phenomenona. Advocates meditation, asceticism and ethics as a way to understand truth and reduce suffering. Philosophical works can be very technical but are centered on the denial, establishing what reality is not instead of directly pointing at the non-conceptual knowledge. The oldest form of pessimism and had a great influence on all the other groups of pessimism.

Buddha and his followers

Nuclear Pessimism

Pessimism that philosophically advocates for the extinction of Humanity by means of the total nuclear warfare.

Ulrich Horstmann

Cosmic Nihilism Pessimism

Pessimism concerned only with the physical materialism, the idea of entropy and the inevitable Heat Death of the Universe. Considers other forms of pessimism too psychological and detached from material reality. Empathizes scientific rationality and rejects all the philosophical attempts to mitigate nihilism.

Ray Brassier

Anti-Humanist Pessimism

Pessimism that advocates against the idea of humanism, considering it irrational, destructive and a secular remnant of religion. Empathizes Gaia Hypothesis of the self-regulation of Earth instead.

John Gray

I've used the Wikpedia list of philisophical pessimists as a source for the list of notable pessimists though I understand that this list can be controversial. Would be glad to hear your thoughts on my attempt to classify them into groups.

reddit.com
u/Pitiful_Magazine_805 — 2 months ago