
u/Zipper222222

While Actively Trying to Deny Millions This Right, Trump Again Votes by Mail
commondreams.orgDemocratic socialist Angie Nixon clinches nomination for Florida US Senate seat, in surprise primary win for progressives
theguardian.comSenator Jon Ossoff (D - GA) Criticizes Trump's Relationship With His 35-Year-Old Aide, Natalie Harp — What Do You Think Of This? Why Your Thoughts?
Newsweek on this: https://www.newsweek.com/jon-ossoff-turns-spotlight-on-donald-trump-aide-natalie-harp-12330009
From the article: "While the sailors on the Lincoln fight his war, while he fruitlessly drains our munitions and oil reserves, the president sleeps through his meetings," Ossoff said. "He golfs and trades stocks. See, he doesn't want to do the job. He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar."
Melania’s Secret Power Struggle With Trump’s Blonde Companion Revealed - The first lady does not appreciate her husband’s 35-year-old assistant, according to a Trump biographer.
thedailybeast.comCNN Interviews Major Jason Watson — "[President] 'has failed us': Air Force Major calls for President's impeachment"
youtube.com‘No, I’m Not Going to Pledge That’: Blanche Refuses to Vow Independence From Trump
commondreams.orgSenate hopeful Talarico touts his faith. Texas Republicans call it blasphemy.
washingtonpost.comTrump, 80, Fantasizes About Dead President in Bizarre Posting Spree - As sailors endure grueling conditions aboard a carrier in his Iran war, Trump has been busy posting bizarre AI-generated fantasies on Truth Social.
thedailybeast.com"The Defense Department says ice cream served to sailors aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln a month ago proves the ship is not in crisis, despite pleas for help from sailors’ families."
thedailybeast.comOhio Democratic Party's New Public Statement — "NEW CLIP: Vivek Ramaswamy Calls Social Security Privatization a 'Reasonable Conversation to Have'"
ohiodems.org‘Brazen Act of Self-Dealing’: Trump Regulator Approves Trump Family Crypto Firm’s Bank Application - “We have never seen financial conflicts or corruption of this magnitude.”
commondreams.orgJames Talarico Endorsed by Attorney Accusing Opponent Ken Paxton of Theft
newsweek.comIn Which Position Do You Sleep? Why Your Pick?
On your side? Facing up? Facing down? Which one? Why?
Would You Support A Constitutional Amendment To Undo The Supreme Court's Recent Presidential Immunity Ruling (Read Description)?
The SCOTUS ruling, Trump v. US, basically gives broad criminal immunity for all "official acts" to a president, which presidents could theoretically interpret "official acts" as broadly as possible if ever challenged in court.
If this ruling were undone via amendment, it would likely take away the extent of this immunity and make it much easier to prosecute former presidents for things they did while they were in office, so if a president does something bad, they can't claim immunity under this amendment proposal.
Let's see what Reddit thinks on this...
The case (Argued April 2024, decided July 2024): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf
Progressive Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan wins Minnesota Democratic Senate primary
nbcnews.comLike The Website Kalshi Or Not, Just Posting Here What The Odds Say Today, Day Of The Primary...
Francesca Hong’s “Thanksgiving-Gate” Shows Her Detractors Are Totally Out of Ideas - Today’s Democratic gubernatorial primary in Wisconsin has featured increasingly desperate attacks against the frontrunner.
theintercept.comNYT Opinion Guest Essay — "He’s Young and Thoughtful, With Kennedy-esque Good Looks. Can He Break the Republican Grip on His State?"
nytimes.comWould You Support A Constitutional Amendment To Undo Big Money In Politics / Mandate Public Funding Of Elections (Read Description)?
Basically, the idea would be an amendment that A, overturns the Citizens United SCOTUS Case, which let Super PACs as we know them exist today (companies can fund elections as much as they want if they don't coordinate with candidates), and then B, mandate that the only money that can be used in elections is publicly funded, meaning every candidate for X or Y office has an even playing field, example (NOT saying that this would guaranteed be the number, just and EXAMPLE): Every candidate for X US House race may only use $100,00 maximum, which would be publicly funded.
Let's see what Reddit thinks of this...