u/alexfreemanart

Question addressed to latinoamerican Zionists

I don't understand much but i've recently become very interested in this sub and its discussions, and i find it hard to figure out what you all mean by 'materialism'.

What's going on with this concept, why is it so controversial and why does it generate so much discussion?

CLARIFICATION: This question is directed exclusively at Brazilians who have decided to vote for Flávio or who support Flávio.

I have to be honest: i have no idea. Why will you, as a Brazilian, vote for the son of an ex-president who was convicted of attempting a coup? Why is it worth it to you to vote for Flávio over every other presidential candidate, including Lula?

Please feel free to say whatever you want. I won't criticize you, argue with you or judge your political opinions. I created this post with a genuine intention to understand those who plan to vote for Flávio or who support him.

I expect the person who does this first is alive today, who do you think will be first to upload their consciousness to either be an AI, stored and used online so their brain can live forever.

Which country has legitimate territorial sovereignty over the island of Taiwan?

1. the ROC
2. the PRC

Note: Please use the official Reddit app or New Reddit to vote in this interactive poll.

---

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

I mean strictly and specifically things that nobody ever taught you, told you, or explained to you before you discovered or learned them, and that you had to figure out on your own. It can be about any topic, but especially things like money, work, moving out and becoming independent, relationships, being a parent, living alone, dealing with paperwork, handling responsibilities, or just everyday situations that you never imagined you'd have to face before 18.

Has there been another U.S. president who was even more corrupt? If Trump isn't the most corrupt, then who is, and why?

What matters most to me is this: in saying this, is he rejecting democracy itself and reaffirming his antidemocratic stance?

Is it compatible by definition for someone who is a techno-accelerationist and a transhumanist to also be a conservative?

If it is possible, how can a person be a techno-accelerationist, a transhumanist and a conservative at the same time? Could you illustrate it with examples?

I completely understand that a techno-accelerationist and transhumanist can totally reject conservatism if they so choose. But is it possible for someone like that to be a conservative?

But why? What's going on and who's responsible for this?

And more importantly: is this a good thing or a bad thing?