EIYPO: if everyone is a projection, why doesn’t everyone conform to the same assumption?
I’ve been thinking about EIYPO (Everyone Is You Pushed Out) and there’s one point I’m struggling to understand.
According to the theory, if I change my identity/assumptions and act with a person — whether that person is someone I love, a family member, a friend, etc. — that person can eventually reflect those assumptions back to me in the 3D.
So here’s my question.
Let’s take a completely different example: imagine a man goes to a club and approaches 100 random women.
If EIYPO means that everyone in our reality is reflecting our assumptions, why wouldn’t all 100 women respond according to his self-concept?
For example, if his identity is:
“Women find me extremely attractive, they desire me, and they love talking to me.”
why might 20 women be very interested, 30 neutral, 30 reject him, and 20 not even engage?
Aren’t all 100 of them part of the same projected reality?
And if we say that we can assume a different version of one person and eventually experience that version of them, why would the same principle not automatically apply to random people we encounter?
In other words:
Why can a special person conform to an assumption while random people may apparently behave completely differently from that assumption?
Is the explanation that we hold different assumptions about each individual?
Is there a difference between a general self-concept such as “I am desired” and a specific assumption such as “this particular person desires me”?
Or, within EIYPO, would the theory actually say that if the man completely embodied “every woman I approach is attracted to me,” then eventually all 100 should reflect that?
I’m genuinely trying to understand the internal logic of EIYPO here rather than argue against it, so I’d especially like to hear from people who have studied Neville deeply.