u/Rainbow_6505

I liked her beauty videos from back in the day before 2020. I liked her skin care videos including ones she made before 2020 and her videos on products not worth the hype or disappointing products. Just now I was on YouTube and saw her channel after trying to look up at least one video of her

Good job he grew out of it. What deep rooted issue do you think could have influenced him to be the way he was when he first appeared on the show.

Some people do regret not having another.

Like they are walking off and no one knows where they are going. Then they are never get seen or mentioned again. Those kind of exits do happen sometimes in soap opera world. Is cliffhanger the right word to describe that kind of exit in soap opera world.

Some people are concerned about them causing environmental issues since they are chemical plastics. People have been concerned about them causing environmental issues in the waterways as well possibly to marine animals.

As much as shitty humans can still have decent parents.

Did you find it easy to wash out. Or did it leave your hair looking and/or feeling the way some oils can do so when they’ve not been washed out properly.

Rhode beauty do a unscented version and Allies Of Skin also do one but both of them are over £10. So it you don’t want to spend over £10 on a lip balms. I really wish Daise beauty did a fragrance free version of their peptide lip balm which is only £5.

I know enough of the shows had characters that started off as friends eventually became a couple. I wish there were more examples of opposite sex friendships on these shows that stayed as they were. It would be one way to normalise opposite sex friendships. Besides it’s totally possible for love not to start from friendship and maybe there needs to be more Disney channel shows with examples of couples that didn’t start off as friends.

Habiba's "| don't want him" was a reason. The Prophet PBUH accepted it without lecturing her about paradise.
The question isn't whether divorce is to be taken lightly. The question is: who decides what counts as a "strong enough" reason? The classical scholars say: the woman.
Handing that decision to strangers, husbands, in laws, sheikhs is the cultural distortion my video was nointina to. After someone commented this (Sunan In Majah 2054)
It was narrated from Ibn 'Abbas that the
199
Prophet (\*) said:
"No woman asks for divorce when it is not absolutely necessary, but she will never smell the fragrance of paradise, although its fragrance can be detected from a distance of forty years' travel. " (Sunan Abi Dawud 2226)
Narrated Thawban:
The Prophet (a) said: If any woman asks her husband for divorce without some strong reason, the odour of Paradise will be forbidden to her.

With its equality for men, and that is why the male and female fetus were equal in the family for the lack of his parents, which is the ghur, so what is less than a third lowered the status of the fetus.

As for inheritance, the wisdom of preference is evident in it; the male is more in need of money than the female; because men are superior to women, and the male is more beneficial to the dead in his life than the female. Almighty God has referred to this by saying after the imposition of the dutities and the difference between their ingredients {Your fathers and children, you do not know which of them is more useful to you} \[Women: 11\] And if the male is more useful than the female and more needy, it is more deserving of preference.

If it is said: This is the negation of the mother's son. It was said: Rather, this settlement between the mother's male and female son was expelled, for they are only inherited by the abstract womb. The kinship with which they inherit is only female, and they are equal in it; there is no point in preferring their male over their female, other than the kinship of the father. As for the Aqeeqah, the matter of preference in it is a follower of the honor of the male, and what God has distinguished it over the female, and since the grace on the father is more complete, and the pleasure and joy in it is complete; the two thanks were more for him; for the more grace, the more thankful it is, the more thanks, and God knows best.

\[Chapter of wisdom in distinguishing between time, time, place and place in credit\]

Chapter:

\[Prisdom in distinguishing between time, time, place and place\]

As for his saying: “He specified some times and places, and preferred some of them over others, with their equality - etc.” The first introduction is true, and the second is false. Some of them were preferred over each other except for characteristics that required allocation, and nothing was specified by the Almighty except by an allocation, but it may be visible and may be hidden, and the participation of times and places in the name of time and space, such as the participation of the animal in the name of animal and man in the name of humanity, and even other races in the sense that pervailates them.

And that should not be leveled in themselves, and the differences have many things in common, and the agreements vary in many things, and God, glory be to Him, is wiser and knowing more knowledgeable than to prefer, an example, on an example from every face without a character that requires weighting it, this is impossible in his creation and command, and glory be to Him, He does not differentiate between the similar from every face; His wisdom and justice refuse this and this.

Glory be to Him, He has made himself glorified by those who think of this, and denied his false claim, and made it a denied judgment, and if it were permissible for him to do what they say, his arguments and evidence would be invalidated; its based on the ruling of the thing is a ruling like it, and on not being settled between the different; He does not make the righteous like the infidels, nor the believers like the infidels, nor those who obeyed him like his stick,

I made a post about part one over here https://www.reddit.com/r/exmuslim\_women/s/Ro8G9nyJZv