u/Evan_AFTON-1983

How would people react to him irl, why? And when, and is it out of fear or disgust? What do you think would happen? How would you react to him?

Why are some people in Reddit so easily offended and assume that if someone says something they disagree with (and even add apologies) they'll still try to argue, instead of correcting them, they'll swear at the person, example, if someone says they don't like {insert animal} for a valid reason, still get insulted

Like, let's say my character has beef with someone because that someone tried to kill them, so tell me why their enemy's friend comes in and they gang up on me/the character but when I'm in fights, my friends in that game ignore me

They consider cats like my cat evil, while if their dog does something terrible they excuse it as the victim's fault, not all cats are evil, not all dogs are good, it's rude to assume that someone's cat is evil just because you like dogs more. My cat is a sweetheart, he doesn't bite, I don't understand why people who like cats more don't mind dogs but those who like dogs oftentimes hate cats not all do though

I posted "I repeatedly start my posts with a apology, one warning* at the top, multiple at the end, make sure that people know I'm talking about some people but some people twist my words and accuse me of homophobia, transphobia, and that I dislike the LGBTQIA community. I don't, the worst part is they probably also look through my rants to accuse me of homophobia for small mistakes that they could correct me about. And they immediately start insulting me and such, sometimes targeting me personally, like I once made a rant about how you shouldn't harass someone because of their sexualities/sexuality and that it's stupid. I later mentioned that some people in the community act entitled to special treatment because of their sexualities/sexuality and that those types of people in the community are rude, and that accusing someone of homophobia is also rude (specifically for no reason) and I ask for peace in my posts. But it never works, I even got told that entitled people don't exist in the LGBTQIA community, they exist in every community! Twisting someone's words like that is also rude" and my post got removed within a second, how is that offensive,

Koro-sensei would be a terrifying teacher irl, cheating on a test? Impossible, playing games instead of doing your homework at school or any work like math (impossible or hard) gossiping, extremely hard,

I'm reflecting on myself, whenever I post on Reddit, I'm never clear enough to avoid getting insulted, and personally attacked. (verbally) Like when I make rants, talking about certain stuff like sensitive topics. People don't assume that I mean well but they do ssume that I'm rude and such, and I think it's partly my fault for not being clear enough, and I'm sorry for that but sometimes it's not my fault that 𝐒𝐎𝐌𝐄 people only read what pisses them off. I sometimes have to apologize in my rant before posting too, or make it clearer at the end, like trying to make sure that people don't just assume things. I think that maybe I should just stop assuming that everyone will understand that I mean well on reddit, maybe put a few warnings at the start,

All my posts about the LGBTQIA are rarely nice, not that I don't post nice things, I do but the people in the comments all call me transphobic, homophobic, and sometimes get aggressive enough to target me personally, even if I post something nice about the community. They look through my post to look for something that proves I'm 'homophobic' which I'm not, it's got to the point that I have to apologize in my post before posting it, it's kinda scary tbh because I don't know what reaction I'll get, I've researched this topic on Google and Google said:(The Straw Man Fallacy: This happens when someone takes your actual statement, misinterprets it to make it look extreme and malicious, and then attacks that extreme version instead. For example, you said "don't automatically assume a young child is trans just because they don't like gender stereotypes," and they pretended you said "trans people shouldn't exist." They attacked a "straw man" version of your argument. / Weaponized Labeling: This is when someone uses a high-stakes, socially devastating label (like "homophobe") as a tactical tool to automatically win an argument. The goal is not to debate your logic; it is to force you onto the defensive so you have to prove you are a good person rather than talking about the actual topic.) I feel like it's a big problem, threats because you don't agree with someone? Example quote from one of my posts "You shouldn't harass someone because of their sexualities/sexuality, it's stupid to do that. And it's just a sexuality, it doesn't become a problem until they feel entitled to special treatment because of it or they want biological kids. The problem is, some members of the community seem to act like they're better than everyone else because of their sexualities, and when you try to correct them about it, they assume that your homophobic, (I'm not though, just making things clear) accusing someone of homophobia is rude too, just be nice and ask why they think so and why they're asking" I asked for peace in my rant, by biological kids I mean that LGBTQIA people aren't always attracted to the opposite gender so it's kinda hard to have biological kids, that's how it becomes a problem for them, I don't have a problem with it. And someone told me that rude and entitled people don't exist in the community, rude and entitled people exist in every community!

All my posts about the LGBTQIA are rarely nice, not that I don't post nice things, I do but the people in the comments all call me transphobic, homophobic, and sometimes get aggressive enough to target me personally, even if I post something nice about the community. They look through my post to look for something that proves I'm 'homophobic' which I'm not, it's got to the point that I have to apologize in my post before posting it, it's kinda scary tbh because I don't know what reaction I'll get, I've researched this topic on Google and Google said:(The Straw Man Fallacy: This happens when someone takes your actual statement, misinterprets it to make it look extreme and malicious, and then attacks that extreme version instead. For example, you said "don't automatically assume a young child is trans just because they don't like gender stereotypes," and they pretended you said "trans people shouldn't exist." They attacked a "straw man" version of your argument. / Weaponized Labeling: This is when someone uses a high-stakes, socially devastating label (like "homophobe") as a tactical tool to automatically win an argument. The goal is not to debate your logic; it is to force you onto the defensive so you have to prove you are a good person rather than talking about the actual topic.) I feel like it's a big problem, threats because you don't agree with someone? Example quote from one of my posts "You shouldn't harass someone because of their sexualities/sexuality, it's stupid to do that. And it's just a sexuality, it doesn't become a problem until they feel entitled to special treatment because of it or they want biological kids. The problem is, some members of the community seem to act like they're better than everyone else because of their sexualities, and when you try to correct them about it, they assume that your homophobic, (I'm not though, just making things clear) accusing someone of homophobia is rude too, just be nice and ask why they think so and why they're asking" I asked for peace in my rant, by biological kids I mean that LGBTQIA people aren't always attracted to the opposite gender so it's kinda hard to have biological kids, that's how it becomes a problem for them, I don't have a problem with it. And someone told me that rude and entitled people don't exist in the community, rude and entitled people exist in every community!

(Info from Google, this isn't meant to be political) Okay, millions of responsible teens are paying the price for the actions of one household. Many used the free-form chat as a "digital sketchbook" for world-building and complex creative writing. Many teens feel deeply insulted that tech companies assume no minor has digital literacy. They point out that they know how to spot fake information, they know the bots aren't real, and they know how to block or report a glitchy bot. They feel it is deeply unfair to treat an entire generation like "babies" because a few people couldn't handle the platform. Users argue that Character.ai should have built a precise keyword block system for crisis words rather than stripping open-ended chat from every minor on the platform. Misplaced Blame: Many argue that the focus should have been on parental gun safety and addressing real-world teen mental health, rather than blaming lines of code on a screen. For many introverted or socially anxious teens, Character.ai was a judgment-free zone to vent about school stress or relax after a bad day. Responsible users are angry because adults assume every teen who talks to an AI is "addicted" or "unhealthy," ignoring that for most, it was just a comforting, quiet hobby. (Information from Google and now my own opinion) I feel like they're forgetting the responsible teens who just want to chat, I do feel bad for that boy, truly do, but why should we be blamed for him having parents who thought he was fine instead of taking him to therapy

Quick research:The Straw Man Fallacy: This happens when someone takes your actual statement, misinterprets it to make it look extreme and malicious, and then attacks that extreme version instead. For example, you said "don't automatically assume a young child is trans just because they don't like gender stereotypes," and they pretended you said "trans people shouldn't exist." They attacked a "straw man" version of your argument. Weaponized Labeling: This is when someone uses a high-stakes, socially devastating label (like "homophobe") as a tactical tool to automatically win an argument. The goal is not to debate your logic; it is to force you onto the defensive so you have to prove you are a good person rather than talking about the actual topic. This happens even when you say something nice about the LGPTQIA community, in a long rant, they'll hunt for an excuse to start an argument even if you make it clear in your text/hot take that you don't mean to start any argument, and even say that your not homophobic or transphobic, they'll find one tiny reason. I speak from experience, I mentioned how some LGPTQIA community members seem like they're above everyone else/being jerks, or give off the vibe that they're entitled to special treatment for something as simple as sexuality, I made sure to mention SOME, not all, The Kafka-Trap (The Defensive Trap): The moment you are accused of something terrible, your natural human instinct is to defend yourself and say, "I am not that!". The moment you do this, you have lost the argument. You are no longer talking about your original point; you are now desperately pleading to prove your innocence to a judge who has already found you guilty. Do Not JEDI (Justify, Argue, Defend, Explain): Refuse to state your credentials as a good person. Saying "I have friends who are..." or "I'm not a bad person" validates their right to judge you. Skip the defense entirely. Hold Up a Mirror (Pattern Interruption): Call out the rhetorical move they are making instead of the words they used. People use labels so they don't have to consider anything you are saying. If a Redditor disagrees with one sentence of your post, they will slap a label like "homophobe," "misogynist," or "bigot" on you. Once that label is applied, your entire argument is dismissed by the community without anyone actually reading it. That's my rant mixed with some research, I seriously hate when people call you homophobic with no actual evidence

You shouldn't harass someone because of their sexualities/sexuality, it's stupid to do that. And it's just a sexuality, it doesn't become a problem until they feel entitled to special treatment because of it or they want biological kids. The problem is, some members of the community seem to act like they're better than everyone else because of their sexualities, and when you try to correct them about it, they assume that your homophobic, (I'm not though, just making things clear) accusing someone of homophobia is rude too, just be nice and ask why they think so and why they're asking, I feel like those who act entitled to special treatment are rude.

I miss when YouTube appeals had humans reviewing them and not bots, because oftentimes, they get their appeal denied very quickly, then there's the cause of your channel being removed, because some bots reported your channel over 300 or 600 times, or the other problem, you rant about a big Youtuber's lies and get your channel removed (under 50 subscribers) but if a big youtuber did that too, they'd just get a bunch of likes, I speak from experience, and I personally think it's unfair how small youtubers get treated unfairly,

I hate Viv sometimes, first for ruining the amazing vibe of the Hazbin hotel pilot because she couldn't stand some criticism, I don't want to hear anyone trying to defend her, I said sometimes, not all the time, but it feels like a immature choice,

First of 𝐚𝐥𝐥:I’m not trying to attack anyone — I’m genuinely trying to understand something I’ve noticed. It feels like companies and media treat different awareness months in very different ways. Pride Month tends to get a lot of visibility, while Women’s History Month and International Women’s Day often feel more symbolic or less consistently highlighted. I might be missing context here, so I’d really appreciate insight on why this difference exists — whether it’s marketing strategy, social pressure, or something else, now for historical facts:

(Users frequently vent about how fake it feels when a company puts up a single social media post on March 8th saying "Happy Women's Day," but does nothing to fix the gender pay gap, offer better maternity leave, or promote women into leadership roles for the rest of the year.Many Reddit posts point out how unfair it is that schools, stores, and media completely ignore the rest of March. Women ask: "Why do we have to dig to find out it's Women's History Month, but we can't escape the advertising for Pride?", yes, support the gays but why can't companies give women more attention? Women suffered much longer than the gays) "Comparing the historical oppression of women to the oppression of LGBTQIA+ individuals reveals a stark truth: women have suffered under systemic oppression for roughly 10,000 years longer than the LGBTQIA+ community." Said google, so I did my research, Era / TimelineOppression of Women (Patriarchy)Oppression of LGBTQIA+ People (Homophobia)10,000 BCE (12,000 years ago)Systemic Oppression Begins. The Agricultural Revolution introduces private property. Men take control of resources and begin restricting women's bodies and freedom to ensure legal heirs. homophobia Non-Existent. Hunter-gatherer and early agrarian societies have no concept of "homosexuality" as an identity and widely tolerate diverse sexual behaviors.1700 BCE (3,700 years ago):Written into Law. The Code of Hammurabi codifies women as the physical property of men. Women completely lose legal autonomy., the gays:Generally Accepted. Same-sex behavior is recorded across early empires (Mesopotamia, Egypt) without widespread systemic hatred, 300s BCE (2,300 years ago):Greek philosophers like Aristotle institutionalize misogyny, writing that women are "incomplete males" born to be ruled., vs the gays:Highly Celebrated. In Classical Greece, same-sex relationships between adult men and younger males are integrated into mentoring, military, and social life, 300s CE (1,700 years ago):Continued Subjugation. Women are completely barred from public life, political power, and religious leadership in the West.Systemic Oppression Begins. The late Roman Empire adopts Christianity. For the first time in Western history, laws prescribe the death penalty for same-sex relations.Because institutional homophobia is historically newer (about 1,700 years old) and reached a terrifying medicalized peak in the 20th century, the pushback against it has been fast, loud, and incredibly compressed. The modern gay rights movement exploded onto the streets in the 1969 Stonewall Riots. This compact, high-energy timeline is exactly what modern corporations find easy to package, brand, and sell every June.,

Why do wars exist, why force innocent people into a war caused by a leader or the leaders, why can't the leaders fight each other in a boxing ring instead of using nukes, and harming the innocent, like, what's the point of war,