I've seen people argue that the episode count was the issue and I would agree..if this show didn't exist and accomplish more with the characters and their arcs in more or less the same amount of time.

I've seen people argue that the episode count was the issue and I would agree..if this show didn't exist and accomplish more with the characters and their arcs in more or less the same amount of time.

Over the Garden Wall is proof you can tell a fully realized story with good arcs and overall consistent growth amongst the cast and good worldbuilding and lore.

It's not impossible but issue was that Gooseworks bit off way more then she could chew in this show.

She basically gave herself a big cast with 9 episodes and thought that would be enough but she lacked the writing experience or foresight to handle each of these characters properly with a consistent arc and actual equal focus amongst the cast and not just pour everything into one character.

Also TADC feels more rushed cause this is a character driven show and everyone except Jax barely feels properly fleshed out and explored beyond their basic bullshit..Pomni and Kinger are the closest things to "fleshed out" and even that's debatable and even Jax's arc feels as wide as a ocean but as rushed as a bad pool digging and as shallow as a puzzle.

None of the cast ever really talks or bonds with each other outside of trauma dumping or unless the plot demands it.

Gooseworks has a good amount of potential as a writer and storyteller + this was her first overall major project, so I understand there being massive hiccups here and there but I really pray she swallows her pride and gets a co-writer or a more experienced writing team.

u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 8 hours ago

Genuine question...why the hell are people so goddamn Picky with how certain main characters are portrayed?

I feel like discussing certain main characters in certain subreddits/pages is almost as impossible as discussing female characters in a anime subreddit cause people are so GODDAMN PICKY and it ruins any sort of fun.

I can understand inconsistencies will be annoying here and there but it gets to a point where it just gets kinda..no,not kinda..REALLY annoying with how insanely picky and overly specific certain fans of MCs can be.

I'm not even straight up saying you can't critique or have issues or preferences but it gets to a point where it's like..ok,we get it,you didn't like that version of him due to your own bias or just finding another version of said character better,that is completely and totally fine but come on,can we try to have a reasonable discussion and talk about this instead of constantly bitching,arguing and all that?

The first example of this..is goddamn Sonic.

Like Sonic fans genuinely do not know what they want out of this Hedgehog cause they hate when he shows emotions,they hate when he has fun,they hate when he does anything and you guys treat Sonic like how Makima from Chainsaw Man treats Pochita/Chainsaw Man.

Sonic fans see Sonic show any sort of emotion or feelings or have any flaws or good traits or just fucking anything from him and go crazy in the worst way possible and this goes for the whole franchise as well..cause Sonic fans deadass are almost never happy.

Another example of this Post..is Ash Ketchum.

The way Ash fans talk about him,you would think he has split personality disorder with the way they talk about how he was in Kalos and Alola.

Like these are literally the same character,the only difference is the Artstyle.

Ash is still a competent and skilled trainer in Alola(he literally gained the interest of Tapu Koko in like..the first episode)but he's just learning new things cause he's not only on vacation but in a entirely new region.

People be acting like he goes out and does math tests and all that when he does the island trials and battles Totem Pokemon and all that.

It's to a point where they can't even happy that he won the league cause he didn't win with the team and way they specifically want and it shows.

I would argue Alola Ash is one of his best portrayals..if you don't like that version of him,fine but you don't have to Mischaracterize him.

I would also argue characters like Superman and Batman tend to fit this mold as does Spider-Man and i get that there are different versions of these characters so discussions can be very muddled and messy but at the same time,why not just explain what you want out of these characters instead of just complaining and being overly critical to the point of obnoxiousness?

I'm not saying you can't like certain portrayals or versions of characters and if you do,more power to you,that is straight up fine.

But actually say what you want with these characters and express what you like as well as criticism instead of just being painfully nit-picky.

reddit.com
▲ 7 r/CARTOON+1 crossposts

Another thing that also did suprise me about the movie is that it showed that the Kanker sisters actually do genuinely care about/like the Eds,like that was a big shock.

I honestly thought that they didn't really romantically like them fully and just enjoyed messing with them and maybe they do enjoy messing with them but I feel like this movie did show that their feelings are genuine.

Like I had some noticing that they were real(May trying to give Ed a genuine valentine's card/Marie getting Jealous and upset whenever a girl showed interest in Double D)but this movie did kinda show their feelings are somewhat genuine.

First off,they immediately went to go save them once they saw that the other Cul-de-sac kids were gonna beat the shit out of them and they stopped the other kids from doing so and tied them up so they wouldn't do so.

Also the fact that they were genuinely relieved/happy that they were Okay and weren't as overly aggressive/physical as they were before.

When they also saw Eddy's brother abusing Edd and Eddy,Marie was genuinely shocked/upset + she yelled his name in worry/shock and Lee had to be physically held back from fighting him.

This really did give me respect for them weirdly enough cause it shows they do care but are just really misguided.

Also they beat up Sarah,so..W them,fuck her.

u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 3 days ago

Hot take,I have no issue with the "Charlie needs to listen to her friends" more development..my problem is it feels very imbalanced cause the other characters like Vaggi are almost never allowed to be wrong.

Like maybe if the other characters were allowed to be wrong more due to their flaws and actually had to listen to her for once or more often, then I would find it better.

The closest to this happening is Vaggi apologizing for hiding her identity or Lucifer apologizing for not supporting her overall dream and goal but outside of that, she always has to listen to the others advice and thar wouldn't be a issue if they actually didn't always give the perfect advice.

Like let their advice and words be wrong sometimes, let the other characters like Husk or Angel or Vaggi be wrong more often and let them actually listen to her at times,let Charlie be right more often instead of everyone else being constantly right and Charlie needing to be essentially a child and always ask them for things.

Like,let the other cast members be wrong due to their flaws or their bias more often instead of vice versa.

u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 3 days ago

[Loved trope]Characters who are extremely attractive, charming and flirty and it's a important aspect of their character/design(but not necessarily evil)

1.Remy "Gambit" Lebeau from X-Men/Marvel.

2.Felica "Black Cat" Hardy from Spiderman/Marvel.

3.Rouge the Bat from Sonic the Hedgehog.

4.Nemuri "Midnight" Kayama from My Hero Academia.

5.Selina "Catwoman" Kyle from Batman/DC.

6.Emma Frost from X-Men/Marvel(Ok,she was evil but had a redemption arc,so..it good)

u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 3 days ago

Genuinely how down bad are people nowadays to where anything considered "i don't want to get with this women" is a fumble?

Short answer:Really downbad cause y'all be using the word Fumble constantly to the point where I severely question if you actually know what that words means.

Again,Fumbling implies a character is actively trying to get with someone but failed badly due to their personality or they were already in a romantic relationship(or something like that)but was character ruined it due to their flaws and issues.

If someone isn't trying to get with someone or just turns them down,then that's not fumbling,you cannot make someone romantically like you.

That's not how romance and love works.

Just cause y'all are Gooners who would fold if a evil woman or a woman in general showed you a flash of titty doesn't mean everyone else is like you.

First example is Gigantia and Jimmy from My Adventures with Superman.

Now if you wanna argue if Jimmy fumbled Kara or not,that's whatever but how the hell did Jimmy fumble Gigantia?

She literally was gonna experiment on him without his consent, was asking extra personal questions and tweaked out once she got rejected and was trying to turn him into like some animal.

I would argue Jimmy dodged a huge red flag/massive Bullet,not that he fumbled her.

And I'm also seeing people mad that he said that they can just be friends..like how is that a Bad thing?

Y'all really need to stop thinking with your Dicks.

Another example is the weird amount of people who say from Akame GA Kill that Tatsumi fumbled Esdeath..I would argue it was the other way around considering she was and is a literal insane sociopath who enjoyed hurting innocents and was just mentally insane and just cruel and all that + she was just a good amount older then him.

Y'all only say he fumbled cause "tall domanatrix women with big boobs" as if he ain't the victim in this scenario.

Another and this is my last example is certain people saying Saitama fumbled either Fubuki or Tatsumaki..he didn't.

He just didn't romantically like them and it's not like they were S-tiers in personality either, so how the hell did he fumble them?

Fumbling implies intention to get with them..if you're not even romantically into them or trying to get with them,you didn't fumble.

I think the big issue is that people tend to heavily and I mean HEAVILY project onto these characters, like "oh if I was them,I would get with these baddies" and it's like..Cool,they're not you and you are not them,so like..stop.

reddit.com
u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 3 days ago

So like..i find it extremely hard to believe that in the bar scene, these characters are just NOW talking about their personal lives/what they do.

That's one of those things that really doesn't add up to me cause you mean to tell me that these 5 humans prior to Pomni(and others prior)are trapped in this huge digital world with other people and them talking about each other never came up even once?

I can let Jax slide cause of how emotionally walled up and closed off he(she)is and even Kinger cause he's insane but the others?

REALLY?

Also you mean to tell me that no one ever discovered Kinger goes sane in the dark?

Like there was no adventure in darkness or anything like that?

These characters literally do not talk to each other or know anything about each other unless the plot/scene demands it and that really gets annoying for a character driven show.

Also what Jax did to Ribbet was obviously awful but you mean to tell me that Ragatha, someone who was close friends with her prior to Jax coming in,she never once tried to talk to her or help her out when she noticed her distance?

Was Jax being a Light Yagami style manipulator and manipulating everyone?

I don't buy it at all.

It's like how in Pokemon Games where you're not allowed to do or learn anything else about the story until you get your next Badge,these characters do not talk to each other or even bond with each other or know each other at all unless Goose says so.

u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 4 days ago

I dunno how hot of a take this is but while I don't necessarily dislike or hate Vaggi..she's just very "eh" to me.

It's weird cause it's like I full on don't care about her but in a cast of interesting yet(and this is a important one)Flawed and messy characters(minus Nifty)she's just unfortunately really dry to me.

And it's not like I'm all "oh she's only Charlie's girlfriend" cause I know she's not that but it doesn't help that Viv said her main character flaw(s)of being too devoted to Charlie and lacking a identity outside of her and that's not a bad thing writing wise but I just wish it was properly portrayed as a character flaw for her.

We're like 2 seasons in and it has yet to be portrayed as such and I just want her to be interesting and fleshed out,character flaws and all and if that means she becomes somewhat unlikable like Charlie was in S2,then so be it cause at least that would be something.

I've seen people say that she has the role of the "straight man" in the crew and that's fine but almost every straight man is still a flawed character or/and at least somewhat interesting.

I'm not saying she full on doesn't have a personality or anything like that but I just find her really lacking compared to other characters.

The best way to describe my feelings on her are overall indifference and not really hate or dislike.

She's not some man hating Lesbian latina like her haters say cause that's stupid and dumb but she's just missing a certain spice and energy compared to the rest of the cast.

u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 4 days ago

I think what really gets me is despite how much they don't really like Eddy,none of the Cul-de-sac kids fucked with the fact that his own brother was abusing him.

They did not hesitate to fight or want to fight his brother the minute they saw he was hurting him(also Ed came in clutch)and what really got me is how scared Eddy looks.

Like normally this show is all goofy and overexaggerated and all that but this wasn't funny,this was someone's own older brother(someone they look up to)beating the ever loving shit out of their own younger sibling and taking joy in it,like Eddy was genuinely yelling in pain and begging him to stop.

I think if you've even managed to have the Kanker sisters shocked and horrified, you're kind of a piece of shit.

u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 4 days ago

I think a huge problem is that nowadays and even back then, people constantly hold children and teenagers to the same maturity and moral standards of that of Adults.

If you don't like what a character does of any age ,that's more power to you and if you want to critique and have issues with what they do and say and all that, then that is completely all the more power to you.

But uh..I'm gonna let you all in on a secret, Kids and Teens are fucking Immature!

Like they're gonna be immature or say Immature things or act that way at times..kids are also gonna act selfish or reckless or stubborn or just tend to think that they know more then they actually do,thats kinda the point of parents teaching them shit and them maturing and becoming better and learning from their flaws and mistakes is kind of the point..

People always claim they want "accountability" but I think it becomes more apparent that they just want said character to be tortured and abused and constantly be reminded of their flaws and mistakes and choices regardless of how much accountability they take.

Nothing will be enough and it really feels like people are much harder on kids and teen characters then they really should be at times and you don't have to be this overly intense asshole to call someone of any age of out unless you're dealing with a fully grown adult and even then, that's unnecessary.

I also find it weird how people act like teen and kid characters just..stay the same and aren't allowed to grow or develop into better and more mature people snd it just comes off as really black and white cause like...God forbid a teen or kid character makes mistakes/is a asshole at first but over the years and time develops and grows into a better person..crazy,right?

I also think a good chunk of the reason for this..is protection, like they're projecting their feelings onto other characters on how they feel about certain characters and that's where disclosure gets really,really messy cause it becomes obvious nothing a teen/young character will do will ever be enough and if you don't forgive them or whatever, all the most power to you but please like..I don't even really know what to say.

Aang,Katara and Korra and arguably Zuko to a huge extent fit this cause it's like people forget that all of these characters are 12-17 at the beginning of the series.

Hell,we don't see Aang as a adult until the damn movie and my point is that the way people will hold their mistakes above their head and constantly give them shit for it tends to be annoying for disclosure, especially Korra cause at the end of S4,she's a lot more mature and not as hot-headed or aggressive or assertive like she was before.

Yeah, 17 year olds tend to mature and grow into better people as the years go by,crazy huh?

Bakugou from Mha also fits here and this one is particularly annoying cause people are like "his growth and development wasn't deserved" And like..you don't earn or deserve character growth/development ,it's something you get on your own.

Bakugou started off as a asshole and cocky bully who thought he was hot shit until he went to UA and got humbled by teachers and by Deku and over the story ,we see him become less and less of a asshole.

He matures,becomes less arrogant and egotistical + his relationship with Deku actually gets better and both his superiority and inferiority complex get confronted and he realizes his mistakes and becomes better,the guy even apologizes to him and also dies for him and puts his faith and trust in Deku.

Like genuinely, what the hell more do y'all want?

And it's also weird how people are like "oh he didn't receive consequences" and I just find that a very broad term cause it's very obvious they just mean him being beat up or constantly reminded of his mistakes while a shame bell rings, they don't actually want growth and development.

Octavia fits here cause people will deadass be mad that the emotionally hurt 17 year old thinks she's the cause of her Dad's suffering and depression and thinks he would be happier without her + is also upset on the fact that he's a loving but still not a amazing father and could improve in a lot of areas and needs space from him.

There will also be times where when people who headcanon/are like "oh these characters most likely got better and became better people as they got older" and others will actively castrate and call you a abuse apologist, like God forbid I wanna headcanon character growth/development over literal middle schoolers.

Boscha from the Owl House fits at this point cause people will deadass look at you crazy if you're like "hey this 14 year old girl likely became a better person over the years",like that's a hot take.

The Kanker sisters fit here as well and I'm gonna be real..dislike them and what they do all you want but please do not act like the goddamn moral police.

Like this is a 90s cartoon, obviously the humor and what the characters do and all that is gonna be extremely exaggerated and all that, there is no need to get your balls in a twist.

Also these girls are literally 12.

Like they're not in their 20s,they are literally 12.

They haven't even reached puberty yet,I think only Rolf,Nazz and Kevin are the actual teens of the show(and even then,they're like 13-14),so I want you all to look me in the eye and ask me why I'm the crazy one for being like "hey,these emotionally stunted 12 year old girls likely matured and got better post movie and into their teenage years and onward",like is that not how maturing and puberty works?

We know from the movie that they genuinely like them, so it's like..what are we doing here?

I ask this question for all kid and teen characters, like what are we doing?

Are we really beefing and holding kids and literal teenagers to grown adult standards?

reddit.com
u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 4 days ago

Not even trying to slander but if you think about it,you could genuinely count one maybe one hand the amount of times Jinbei has interacted/had a conversation with the other SHs.

Jinbei genuinely feels like a character that shouldn't have joined the crew cause really,what has he done since then?

Outside of Luffy,he doesn't really have a dynamic or close or genuine friendship/bond with the others and his lack of a overall interesting or even memorable personality just shows and he kinda feels just..there.

Like say what you will about Usopp but at least I remember him at times and he's somewhat memorable + he has a role.

What does Jinbei bring to the crew/table?

u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 5 days ago

I think what gets me is that Gooseworks isn't necessarily a terrible writer(trust me,I've seen way worse)but her lack of writing experience really shows in TADC,especially the end.

Like this show is genuinely one of the most "Potential Man" shows I've seen cause it has all these concepts and lore and other characters that could all be S-tier if she gave them the time of day.

And it's like necessarily the episode length thats the issue.

Over the Garden Wall proved you can tell a fully developed story with fleshed out and explored characters and lore in a short amount of time,they only had 10 episodes.

I think what Gooseworks lacked was not only experience but also she needed like a co-writer or 2 to bounce ideas and such off + someone to tell her when and which ideas are dumb.

u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 5 days ago

[Forever loved trope]When the villain(or antagonist/rival)ragebaiting the hero works a little too well and they actively lose + almost get killed cause of it.

1.Ozai against Aang in the Last Airbender.

He was basically taunting and mocking Aang for being weak like "the Rest of his people" and..you know the rest,he gets his powers up and yoinked.

2.Yuji against Mahito in Jujutsu Kaisen.

Mahito basically spends the entire fight torturing/taunting and trying to break Yuji to prove that they're the same and completely alike and In the end,Yuji more or less goes "yeah, you're right,we are the same..lemme show why that's not a good thing for you."

3.Kingpin against Spiderman in the Marvel comics.

Long story short, Aunt May gets shot by Kingpins goons and Spiderman...No,Peter Parker breaks into the prison to run the ones with Kingpin and the big man thinks he got this..spoilers,he does not.

u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 5 days ago

Genuine question, why is it so hard for people to just have a middle ground with certain characters?

I feel like both fans and haters of certain characters go too far in opposite directions and that tends to affect how people overall see their arc and that's kind of a issue.

It's not impossible or hard to just..acknowledge a character's flaws or mistakes while also acknowledging and praising their good qualities as either a person or just as a overall character and it feels like both sides of a character's group go too far in opposite directions.

Acknowledging a character is funny or interesting or likable or anything like that isn't ignoring the bad things/mistakes they've done nor is it impossible to hold them accountable for their mistakes without coming off as overly petty,nitpicky or just..a asshole.

It just feels like on here,you either really love a character or you just really hate a character and there's no gray area of "they've made mistakes and some of their choices were justified and some were not but at the same time,they're a overall still good person or character and acknowledging their good traits isn't a bad thing" or "how said character acted was wrong and they made mistakes but it's understandable due to circumstances why".

I say this as someone who was in the Last Airbender and L.O.K Fandom and that place more or less has the same issues with character's like Iroh,Zuko,Katara and even Korra.

You got people who like them ignore and downplay their mistakes but you also got people who hate them just ignore their growth and development and act like they're just..demons, like Nooo..THERE'S A FUCKING MIDDLE GROUND.

Hazbin hotel overall has this problem with characters like Sera or Charlie or Stolas or Lucifer or Blitz or Angel Dust.

You can't really talk about them without people who love them ignoring their flaws and mistakes but you also also can't talk about them without people who hate them just constantly bringing up their mistakes and flaws as if that's all that defined them as characters and people.

This also works for a lot of other groups as well,you can't really praise or critique a character without both people who love them or hate them going too far in both sides and that kinda ruins disclosure.

reddit.com
u/Charming-Scratch-124 — 5 days ago
▲ 412 r/HuskCult18Plus+1 crossposts

Honestly, Casting Keith David as Husk is genuinely one of the best casting choices Viv has done cause it weirdly adds a lot to our favorite Cat Magician.

He just brings so much goddamn charm,mystery and even energy + humor as well.

But then again, it's Keith David,we all suspected he would cook up a masterclass

u/33333Ducky — 5 days ago