Food tracking: track but "bad" and best possible or just not track at all?
Seems like tracking got me the most success so far... I quit tracking cause all apps throw ads on me and it got annoying, so I was always just "counting protein" and nothing else for a while.
But I noticed even while tracking it wasn't 100% correct... but my approach was basically:
My maintainance is 2300 kcal.
If I have a target of 2100 kcal for a deficit and I am cutting and I tracked 1900 kcal, I'd rather not eat anything anymore and hope I am around 2100 maximum.
If I was "bulking" I tried to aim for 2500 kcal and if I was around 2300 kcal I just ate an extra donut or something just to reach 2500-2600.
Is this the right approach if I start tracking again?
I am not sure if I can 100% accuratly track at all (Olive Oil, Take out,...) so I just assume and depend on my goal. If I know I need below 2100 and I counted 1800 I just won't eat or reduce the size so its around 2100 and if I bulk I just make sure to get more than 2300 and to be safe eat a spoon of peanut butter before bed to get the 2.6k+
But other than that I think I was always atleast 150-300 kcal "off" of my calculated stuff I put in the app. Thats why I basically always went for 1800 kcal during a cut instead of 2100 and went for 2600+ to be safe if I wanted to bulk.
To me it seems easier to go "overboard" in either direction than trying to stay in a slight deficit or slight surplus. Dunno... am I just bad at tracking, maybe?
Thats a reason why I am asking if tracking is even worth it for me in my case... lol