u/RedditAPIBlackout24

Solo consultant here, pretty budget-conscious about what I spend on tools. Been thinking about ditching paper cards before my next round of networking events but the pricing on some of these qr card options seems all over the place.

Not sure what's worth paying for vs what's just a nice-to-have. Anyone gone through this and figured out where the value actually is?

Going to a few networking events this quarter and finally thinking about ditching paper cards. But every list I find online seems like it was written by someone who never actually used any of them.

Do the pricier options actually do more, or is it mostly the same stuff with a fancier price tag? Curious what people on real teams are actually using day to day and whether it's made any difference.

I Shazamed the actual songs and they sound nothing like this. And they don't even seem to be the same singers either!!!

Pinoy cover ba ito? Hahaha curious lang kasi bata pa ko narinig ko na to. HAHAHA ganito pa rin sila hanggang ngayon 💀

ok so this might get long or it might not, im kinda just typing and well see where it goes

i was a 5th grade teacher 14 months ago. like literally standing in front of a classroom explaining fractions. and now i make more money sending cold emails than i ever did teaching which is both exciting and honestly a little depressing when you think about what we pay teachers but thats a whole other conversation

the first thing id tell past me is that your first campaign WILL fail and thats not a sign you should quit. my buddy jake who got me into this (shoutout to him, he runs a small agency in austin) basically said "just start sending emails and figure it out" which is terrible advice but also kind of the only advice that matters? i sent my first campaign in march 2024 and it was genuinely awful. wait no i mean it was truly awful. i scraped like 400 contacts off linkedin sales navigator, didnt verify any of them, wrote this long 6 paragraph email about how i could "help transform their business" and blasted it from my personal gmail

bounce rate was 23%. twenty three percent. i didnt even know what a bounce rate was at the time, i just saw all these failure notifications and thought gmail was broken. that campaign got exactly zero replies and my gmail reputation was toast for weeks

month one revenue: $0. month two revenue: $0. i was still teaching and doing this on nights and weekends and my girlfriend at the time thought i was losing it

the other thing i got completely wrong early on was thinking the email copy was the main thing. i spent HOURS watching youtube videos about copywriting (Alex Berman's channel specifically, that guy taught me so much about cold email structure even if i dont agree with everything he says now). but i was obsessing over subject lines and CTAs while sending from a domain with no warmup, no SPF records, no DKIM, nothing. its like spending 3 hours picking the perfect outfit and then showing up to the wrong restaurant

around month 3 i finally invested in actual infrastructure. bought 5 domains through namecheap, set up google workspace on each one, and started warming them up with Instantly. this part is boring and nobody talks about it enough but i warmed those inboxes for a full 3 weeks before sending a single cold email. 3 weeks of just... waiting. as a former teacher who was used to immediate feedback from kids this was painful

but when i finally started sending from warmed domains? reply rate went from literally 0% to about 1.8% on my first real campaign. which sounds terrible but after months of nothing it felt incredible

nobody warned me about the enrichment rabbit hole though. i started with Hunter for finding emails and it was fine for a while but the accuracy was inconsistent, especially for smaller companies. switched to running Prospeo for enrichment around month 4 and the email accuracy jumped to around 82-85% which made a real difference once i was verifying everything through ZeroBounce after. that combo of Prospeo into ZeroBounce kept my bounce rate under 2% consistently which was night and day from my 23% disaster

month 4 is also when i landed my first client. $1,500/mo retainer to do cold email for a small SaaS company selling project management software to construction firms. i had no idea what i was doing with their ICP and i basically just targeted "construction company owners in texas" which is... not specific enough lol. but i got them 3 meetings in the first month and they were happy enough to keep paying me

by month 6 i had 3 clients and was making about $4,200/mo. still teaching. sleeping maybe 5 hours a night. the thing that changed everything for me was when i stopped trying to write clever emails and started writing short boring ones. my best performing email to this day is 43 words long. forty three. it basically says "hey i noticed [specific thing about their company], we help similar companies with [outcome], worth a quick chat?" thats it. no fancy personalization tokens, no humor, no stories. just direct

i quit teaching in september 2024. scariest day of my life honestly. i had about $6k/mo in recurring revenue which is NOT enough to feel comfortable quitting a stable job with benefits but i was burning out trying to do both and something had to give

the low point came in november. lost two clients in the same week. one just ghosted (still hasnt responded to this day) and the other said they were "going in a different direction" which i later found out meant they hired someone cheaper on upwork. revenue dropped to like $2,800/mo and i had rent due and no safety net. i seriously considered going back to teaching. applied to a couple schools actually

but then december happened and i landed a $3k/mo client through a referral and another $2k/mo client from a cold email i sent TO a marketing agency (which felt very meta). by january 2025 i was back to $7,800/mo and climbing

my current stack for anyone curious: LinkedIn Sales Navigator for building lists, Prospeo for email finding which i run before Clay for any extra enrichment on bigger campaigns, ZeroBounce for verification, Instantly for sending and warmup, and HubSpot free tier for CRM because im cheap. total monthly cost is somewhere around $380-420 depending on volume which eats into margins but the infrastructure matters more than saving $50/mo on tools

the thing nobody warned me about is how much of this job is NOT sending emails. its client management. its expectation setting. its explaining to a founder why 3 meetings from 2,000 emails is actually a good result and not a failure. i spend maybe 30% of my time on actual campaign work and 70% on everything else

im at about $12k/mo now across 5 clients. could probably take on one more but im trying to be careful about not overextending because thats what killed my energy last fall. i still feel like i barely know what im doing compared to people who have been in this space for years. i see posts in here from people running 50+ inboxes and managing 20 clients and i honestly dont know how they do it

one more thing - Prospeo plus a good verification tool is the combo that actually let me scale past the "sending emails that bounce constantly" phase. i know thats a boring takeaway but infrastructure and data quality is like 80% of the battle and copy is maybe 20%. took me 6 months to figure that out when it should have taken 6 days

anyway thats my story so far. 14 months in, former teacher, still learning. if youre in month 1 or 2 and nothing is working just know thats completely normal and it doesnt mean youre bad at this it just means you havent made enough mistakes yet

ok so this might get long or it might not, im kinda just typing and well see where it goes

i was a 5th grade teacher 14 months ago. like literally standing in front of a classroom explaining fractions. and now i make more money sending cold emails than i ever did teaching which is both exciting and honestly a little depressing when you think about what we pay teachers but thats a whole other conversation

the first thing id tell past me is that your first campaign WILL fail and thats not a sign you should quit. my buddy jake who got me into this (shoutout to him, he runs a small agency in austin) basically said "just start sending emails and figure it out" which is terrible advice but also kind of the only advice that matters? i sent my first campaign in march 2024 and it was genuinely awful. wait no i mean it was truly awful. i scraped like 400 contacts off linkedin sales navigator, didnt verify any of them, wrote this long 6 paragraph email about how i could "help transform their business" and blasted it from my personal gmail

bounce rate was 23%. twenty three percent. i didnt even know what a bounce rate was at the time, i just saw all these failure notifications and thought gmail was broken. that campaign got exactly zero replies and my gmail reputation was toast for weeks

month one revenue: $0. month two revenue: $0. i was still teaching and doing this on nights and weekends and my girlfriend at the time thought i was losing it

the other thing i got completely wrong early on was thinking the email copy was the main thing. i spent HOURS watching youtube videos about copywriting (Alex Berman's channel specifically, that guy taught me so much about cold email structure even if i dont agree with everything he says now). but i was obsessing over subject lines and CTAs while sending from a domain with no warmup, no SPF records, no DKIM, nothing. its like spending 3 hours picking the perfect outfit and then showing up to the wrong restaurant

around month 3 i finally invested in actual infrastructure. bought 5 domains through namecheap, set up google workspace on each one, and started warming them up with Instantly. this part is boring and nobody talks about it enough but i warmed those inboxes for a full 3 weeks before sending a single cold email. 3 weeks of just... waiting. as a former teacher who was used to immediate feedback from kids this was painful

but when i finally started sending from warmed domains? reply rate went from literally 0% to about 1.8% on my first real campaign. which sounds terrible but after months of nothing it felt incredible

nobody warned me about the enrichment rabbit hole though. i started with Hunter for finding emails and it was fine for a while but the accuracy was inconsistent, especially for smaller companies. switched to running Prospeo for enrichment around month 4 and the email accuracy jumped to around 82-85% which made a real difference once i was verifying everything through ZeroBounce after. that combo of Prospeo into ZeroBounce kept my bounce rate under 2% consistently which was night and day from my 23% disaster

month 4 is also when i landed my first client. $1,500/mo retainer to do cold email for a small SaaS company selling project management software to construction firms. i had no idea what i was doing with their ICP and i basically just targeted "construction company owners in texas" which is... not specific enough lol. but i got them 3 meetings in the first month and they were happy enough to keep paying me

by month 6 i had 3 clients and was making about $4,200/mo. still teaching. sleeping maybe 5 hours a night. the thing that changed everything for me was when i stopped trying to write clever emails and started writing short boring ones. my best performing email to this day is 43 words long. forty three. it basically says "hey i noticed [specific thing about their company], we help similar companies with [outcome], worth a quick chat?" thats it. no fancy personalization tokens, no humor, no stories. just direct

i quit teaching in september 2024. scariest day of my life honestly. i had about $6k/mo in recurring revenue which is NOT enough to feel comfortable quitting a stable job with benefits but i was burning out trying to do both and something had to give

the low point came in november. lost two clients in the same week. one just ghosted (still hasnt responded to this day) and the other said they were "going in a different direction" which i later found out meant they hired someone cheaper on upwork. revenue dropped to like $2,800/mo and i had rent due and no safety net. i seriously considered going back to teaching. applied to a couple schools actually

but then december happened and i landed a $3k/mo client through a referral and another $2k/mo client from a cold email i sent TO a marketing agency (which felt very meta). by january 2025 i was back to $7,800/mo and climbing

my current stack for anyone curious: LinkedIn Sales Navigator for building lists, Prospeo for email finding which i run before Clay for any extra enrichment on bigger campaigns, ZeroBounce for verification, Instantly for sending and warmup, and HubSpot free tier for CRM because im cheap. total monthly cost is somewhere around $380-420 depending on volume which eats into margins but the infrastructure matters more than saving $50/mo on tools

the thing nobody warned me about is how much of this job is NOT sending emails. its client management. its expectation setting. its explaining to a founder why 3 meetings from 2,000 emails is actually a good result and not a failure. i spend maybe 30% of my time on actual campaign work and 70% on everything else

im at about $12k/mo now across 5 clients. could probably take on one more but im trying to be careful about not overextending because thats what killed my energy last fall. i still feel like i barely know what im doing compared to people who have been in this space for years. i see posts in here from people running 50+ inboxes and managing 20 clients and i honestly dont know how they do it

one more thing - Prospeo plus a good verification tool is the combo that actually let me scale past the "sending emails that bounce constantly" phase. i know thats a boring takeaway but infrastructure and data quality is like 80% of the battle and copy is maybe 20%. took me 6 months to figure that out when it should have taken 6 days

anyway thats my story so far. 14 months in, former teacher, still learning. if youre in month 1 or 2 and nothing is working just know thats completely normal and it doesnt mean youre bad at this it just means you havent made enough mistakes yet

OK so I've been in tech sales for about 3 years now, currently at a series B fintech. curious what everyone's using for b2b prospecting these days since the market keeps shifting.

right now my stack is Salesforce (obv), SalesLoft for sequences, and Apollo for contact data. Apollo's decent but getting frustrated with the accuracy lately. probably 1 in 5 emails bounce even though they show as verified. mobile numbers are basically non-existent unless you're looking at VP+ level.

we use Gong for call recording which has been solid. helps a ton for ramping new SDRs. also been testing Clay for some workflow automation but jury's still out on whether it saves time vs just adding complexity.

started looking at Prospeo recently since a buddy at another startup swears by their mobile data. havent pulled the trigger yet but the pricing looks clearly better than what we're paying Apollo.

my manager's been on my ass about connect rates so i need to figure this out soon lol. what else should i be looking at? especially interested in prospecting tools that have accurate mobile numbers since email reply rates are trash lately.

working on a feature for our CRM where sales reps can look up contact info directly from lead records. basically need an email lookup api that takes name + company and returns verified work emails.

been comparing a few options but getting analysis paralysis. hunter seems popular but their data quality reviews are mixed. UpLead has decent coverage but their api pricing gets steep at our volume (probably around 50k lookups/month). clearbit is accurate but crazy expensive.

what are you all using for email search api options? main priorities are accuracy (don't want bounces), reasonable pricing at scale, and decent api docs. bonus if they have mobile numbers too since our sales team keeps asking for that.

also curious about your implementation approach - are you caching results? rate limiting on your end? would love to hear what's worked for others building out similar email finder features.

heres the situation. been doing this for 3 years and I finaly have a process that actualy works. used to just dump whatver I could find into a csv and pray lol.

now I start with intent data to see whos actually looking at solutions in our space. then I layer in technographics to find companies using our competitors tech stack. after that I filter by department growth - if theyre hiring SDRs theyre probably investing in sales tools.

for the actual prospect research and contact finding, ive been testing Prospeo since their data is supposedly fresher than most (weekly refresh vs monthly). also looking at Apollo but Prospeo's mobile number coverage seems better for cold calling. anyone used either for prospect list building workflows?

my main thing is I need accurate direct dials. email is whatver but if I cant get someone on the phone the whole list is useless. Prospeo claims people actually pick up on their mobiles which would be huge if true.

my manager keeps asking me to document my process so the rest of the team can use it and honestly half of it is still vibes based lmao

what are you all using for list building these days? feels like every tool claims insane accuracy but half the numbers are disconnected

Been on Alice for about 3 weeks now. The pitch is compelling - an autonomous SDR that supposedly does everything from research to personalization to followups.

Reality is mixed.

The good: it does send emails without me touching anything. The research it pulls is decent (company news, recent posts, basic firmographics). Setup was pretty straightforward.

The not so good: the personalization is still very AI-sounding despite their claims. Got an 11% reply rate which is below my manual campaigns (usually around 18-22%). Also the pricing gets steep fast, we're looking at $900/month for just 1000 contacts. My manager already asked me twice if this thing is actually worth it.

And the part that's really making me reconsider: you still need to bring your own data. Alice doesn't find contacts for you. So I'm still paying for Apollo on top of this to get contact data, which kind of defeats the purpose of an all-in-one AI sales tool.

Anyone else seeing better results? Maybe I'm using it wrong but the ROI just isn't there yet. Been looking at whether I should just ditch the AI SDR approach entirely and go back to a regular sequence tool with better data from something like Prospeo or Clay.

Hi there!

I hope you can help me. I'm trying to rip/digitize many of the CDs I can find in the house and these three stood out to me because of the logs. Can you help me identify if these are good rips at all? Maybe I'm just not understanding what the log notes mean?

I'm ripping with secure mode on using EAC, and with Test & Copy CRCs enabled. Here are logs for three albums:

3 Doors Down - The Better Life [Universal - CA - 012 153 920-2]

• Track 1 and 11 have a lower number of matches in CTDB compared to the rest of the album. Every track also has "differs in X samples" affixed to it. The CTDB log also has the note "If you are sure that your rip contains errors, you can use CUETools to repair it."
• There are no audible pops or skips, or differences when compared to the version of this album on Spotify.

​

Exact Audio Copy V1.8 from 15. July 2024

EAC extraction logfile from 28. August 2026, 8:50

3 Doors Down / The Better Life

Used drive  : PIONEER BD-RW  BDR-XS07U   Adapter: 1  ID: 1

Read mode               : Secure
Utilize accurate stream : Yes
Defeat audio cache      : Yes
Make use of C2 pointers : No

Read offset correction                      : 667
Overread into Lead-In and Lead-Out          : No
Fill up missing offset samples with silence : Yes
Delete leading and trailing silent blocks   : No
Null samples used in CRC calculations       : Yes
Used interface                              : Native Win32 interface for Win NT & 2000

Used output format : Internal WAV Routines
Sample format      : 44.100 Hz; 16 Bit; Stereo


TOC of the extracted CD

     Track |   Start  |  Length  | Start sector | End sector 
    ---------------------------------------------------------
        1  |  0:00.00 |  3:53.70 |         0    |    17544   
        2  |  3:53.70 |  4:24.60 |     17545    |    37404   
        3  |  8:18.55 |  3:50.45 |     37405    |    54699   
        4  | 12:09.25 |  3:14.07 |     54700    |    69256   
        5  | 15:23.32 |  4:25.68 |     69257    |    89199   
        6  | 19:49.25 |  3:58.30 |     89200    |   107079   
        7  | 23:47.55 |  3:07.60 |    107080    |   121164   
        8  | 26:55.40 |  4:21.72 |    121165    |   140811   
        9  | 31:17.37 |  3:16.30 |    140812    |   155541   
       10  | 34:33.67 |  2:29.70 |    155542    |   166786   
       11  | 37:03.62 |  3:47.73 |    166787    |   183884   


Range status and errors

Selected range

     Filename D:\Music\Sources\2000\02-08 - 3 Doors Down - The Better Life [Universal 012 153 920-2]\3 Doors Down - The Better Life.wav

     Peak level 91.9 %
     Extraction speed 4.5 X
     Range quality 99.9 %
     Test CRC 75B02B2F
     Copy CRC 75B02B2F
     Copy OK

No errors occurred

 
AccurateRip summary
 
Track  1  accurately ripped (confidence 48)  [FB51F525]  (AR v2)
Track  2  accurately ripped (confidence 47)  [0E5B556C]  (AR v2)
Track  3  accurately ripped (confidence 48)  [2021117C]  (AR v2)
Track  4  accurately ripped (confidence 47)  [43B01E38]  (AR v2)
Track  5  accurately ripped (confidence 46)  [F53FA037]  (AR v2)
Track  6  accurately ripped (confidence 45)  [38DEF679]  (AR v2)
Track  7  accurately ripped (confidence 47)  [1C5BB92F]  (AR v2)
Track  8  accurately ripped (confidence 47)  [7EF3CCF4]  (AR v2)
Track  9  accurately ripped (confidence 46)  [3B926FE9]  (AR v2)
Track 10  accurately ripped (confidence 47)  [FEC0F8FB]  (AR v2)
Track 11  accurately ripped (confidence 47)  [3A9E539E]  (AR v2)
 
All tracks accurately ripped

End of status report

---- AcoustID Plugin V1.2.0

Submitting 11 results to AcoustID

AcoustID successfully submitted


---- CUETools DB Plugin V2.2.6

[CTDB TOCID: _BaZzDDgTnlNobArsp35rLqQER4-] found
Submit result: _BaZzDDgTnlNobArsp35rLqQER4- has been confirmed
Track | CTDB Status
  1   | (265/1695) Accurately ripped, or (1359/1695) differs in 2057 samples :00:25-00:00:28, or (13/1695) differs in 2071 samples :00:25-00:00:28, or (2/1695) differs in 2057 samples :00:25-00:00:28, or (2/1695) differs in 3216 samples :00:25-00:00:28,03:53:69-03:53:71
  2   | (1666/1695) Accurately ripped, or (2/1695) differs in 180 samples :42:71-02:42:72, or (2/1695) differs in 2219 samples :00:00-00:00:01,04:24:59-04:24:61
  3   | (1673/1695) Accurately ripped, or (2/1695) differs in 1799 samples :00:00-00:00:01,03:50:44-03:50:46
  4   | (1671/1695) Accurately ripped, or (2/1695) differs in 1892 samples :00:00-00:00:01,03:14:06-03:14:08
  5   | (1669/1695) Accurately ripped, or (2/1695) differs in 1610 samples :00:00-00:00:01,04:25:67-04:25:69
  6   | (1667/1695) Accurately ripped, or (2/1695) differs in 1688 samples :00:00-00:00:01,03:58:29-03:58:31
  7   | (1669/1695) Accurately ripped, or (2/1695) differs in 2170 samples :00:00-00:00:01,03:07:59-03:07:61
  8   | (1673/1695) Accurately ripped, or (2/1695) differs in 2048 samples :00:00-00:00:01,04:21:71-04:21:73
  9   | (1669/1695) Accurately ripped, or (2/1695) differs in 2280 samples :00:00-00:00:01,03:16:29-03:16:31
 10   | (1673/1695) Accurately ripped, or (2/1695) differs in 2197 samples :00:00-00:00:01,02:29:69-02:29:71
 11   | (262/1695) Accurately ripped, or (1359/1695) differs in 1725 samples :47:24-03:47:27,03:47:39-03:47:42, or (13/1695) differs in 1481 samples :47:24-03:47:27,03:47:39-03:47:42, or (2/1695) differs in 1725 samples :47:24-03:47:27,03:47:39-03:47:42, or (2/1695) differs in 2700 samples u/00:00:00-00:00:01,03:47:24-03:47:27,03:47:39-03:47:42
If you are sure that your rip contains errors, you can use CUETools to repair it.


==== Log checksum 07AEA017BF6782875EA547509FA7544B9B5B65A6F34A059CE0BCAA232C7E5E1C ====

Tommy Lee - Never a Dull Moment [MCA - US - 112 856-2]

• All tracks cannot be verified as accurate in AccurateRip
• All tracks are verified as accurate in CTDB, but Track 11 has differences in samples
• No pops, skips or audible differences from the version on Spotify

​

Exact Audio Copy V1.8 from 15. July 2024

EAC extraction logfile from 26. August 2026, 3:30

Tommy Lee / Never a Dull Moment

Used drive  : PIONEER BD-RW  BDR-XS07U   Adapter: 1  ID: 1

Read mode               : Secure
Utilize accurate stream : Yes
Defeat audio cache      : Yes
Make use of C2 pointers : No

Read offset correction                      : 667
Overread into Lead-In and Lead-Out          : No
Fill up missing offset samples with silence : Yes
Delete leading and trailing silent blocks   : No
Null samples used in CRC calculations       : Yes
Used interface                              : Native Win32 interface for Win NT & 2000

Used output format : Internal WAV Routines
Sample format      : 44.100 Hz; 16 Bit; Stereo


TOC of the extracted CD

     Track |   Start  |  Length  | Start sector | End sector 
    ---------------------------------------------------------
        1  |  0:00.00 |  3:33.10 |         0    |    15984   
        2  |  3:33.10 |  3:21.05 |     15985    |    31064   
        3  |  6:54.15 |  2:57.00 |     31065    |    44339   
        4  |  9:51.15 |  3:51.15 |     44340    |    61679   
        5  | 13:42.30 |  3:39.70 |     61680    |    78174   
        6  | 17:22.25 |  4:30.22 |     78175    |    98446   
        7  | 21:52.47 |  3:28.15 |     98447    |   114061   
        8  | 25:20.62 |  4:02.05 |    114062    |   132216   
        9  | 29:22.67 |  2:57.48 |    132217    |   145539   
       10  | 32:20.40 |  4:00.72 |    145540    |   163611   
       11  | 36:21.37 |  3:15.33 |    163612    |   178269   
       12  | 39:36.70 |  1:00.20 |    178270    |   182789   
       13  | 43:09.15 | 16:07.13 |    194190    |   266727   


Range status and errors

Selected range

     Filename D:\Music\Sources\2002\05-21 - Tommy Lee - Never a Dull Moment [MCA 112 856-2]\Tommy Lee - Never a Dull Moment.wav

     Peak level 99.9 %
     Extraction speed 4.6 X
     Range quality 99.9 %
     Test CRC 6FEAEDDA
     Copy CRC 6FEAEDDA
     Copy OK

No errors occurred

 
AccurateRip summary
 
Track  1  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 2)  [A2A6CC67], AccurateRip returned [294BDD10]  (AR v2)
Track  2  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 2)  [9236668C], AccurateRip returned [2B9A6A2C]  (AR v2)
Track  3  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 2)  [6DA9ACF3], AccurateRip returned [9ABBC635]  (AR v2)
Track  4  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 2)  [40F6EE4F], AccurateRip returned [B21F91BA]  (AR v2)
Track  5  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 2)  [92470260], AccurateRip returned [2D042FDF]  (AR v2)
Track  6  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 2)  [FE5A4C7C], AccurateRip returned [43E4BA16]  (AR v2)
Track  7  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 2)  [2215F6A1], AccurateRip returned [9D4DAD34]  (AR v2)
Track  8  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 2)  [93088E44], AccurateRip returned [2749A2A7]  (AR v2)
Track  9  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 2)  [55F5ACFF], AccurateRip returned [7CFFA834]  (AR v2)
Track 10  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 2)  [4FCF3E60], AccurateRip returned [8F767B8D]  (AR v2)
Track 11  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 2)  [46F6A225], AccurateRip returned [364E46D8]  (AR v2)
Track 12  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 2)  [FBCE8BC0], AccurateRip returned [A4C6A37F]  (AR v2)
 
No tracks could be verified as accurate
You may have a different pressing from the one(s) in the database

End of status report

---- AcoustID Plugin V1.2.0

Submitting 12 results to AcoustID

AcoustID successfully submitted


---- CUETools DB Plugin V2.2.6

[CTDB TOCID: 86ZqtuFh.Yvx7n93qx1Ot36TwuM-] found
Submit result: 86ZqtuFh.Yvx7n93qx1Ot36TwuM- has been confirmed
Track | CTDB Status
  1   | (104/110) Accurately ripped
  2   | (104/110) Accurately ripped
  3   | (107/110) Accurately ripped
  4   | (107/110) Accurately ripped
  5   | (107/110) Accurately ripped
  6   | (105/110) Accurately ripped
  7   | (105/110) Accurately ripped
  8   | (107/110) Accurately ripped
  9   | (106/110) Accurately ripped
 10   | (107/110) Accurately ripped
 11   | (107/110) Accurately ripped
 12   | ( 94/110) Accurately ripped, or (11/110) differs in 23520 samples u/00:14:07-00:14:27


==== Log checksum B9A03DC11C8FDDB9AE6AD53271244D020F8709B6B8126794993AD32C239CB931 ====

Bo Bice - The Real Thing [RCA 82876-71196-2]

• Track 9 cannot be verified in AccurateRip and CTDB
• Test and Copy CRCs match

​

Exact Audio Copy V1.8 from 15. July 2024

EAC extraction logfile from 26. August 2026, 8:04

Bo Bice / The Real Thing

Used drive  : PIONEER BD-RW  BDR-XS07U   Adapter: 1  ID: 1

Read mode               : Secure
Utilize accurate stream : Yes
Defeat audio cache      : Yes
Make use of C2 pointers : No

Read offset correction                      : 667
Overread into Lead-In and Lead-Out          : No
Fill up missing offset samples with silence : Yes
Delete leading and trailing silent blocks   : No
Null samples used in CRC calculations       : Yes
Used interface                              : Native Win32 interface for Win NT & 2000

Used output format : Internal WAV Routines
Sample format      : 44.100 Hz; 16 Bit; Stereo


TOC of the extracted CD

     Track |   Start  |  Length  | Start sector | End sector 
    ---------------------------------------------------------
        1  |  0:00.00 |  3:22.67 |         0    |    15216   
        2  |  3:22.67 |  3:33.35 |     15217    |    31226   
        3  |  6:56.27 |  3:49.68 |     31227    |    48469   
        4  | 10:46.20 |  3:47.22 |     48470    |    65516   
        5  | 14:33.42 |  3:18.35 |     65517    |    80401   
        6  | 17:52.02 |  3:48.72 |     80402    |    97573   
        7  | 21:40.74 |  3:48.13 |     97574    |   114686   
        8  | 25:29.12 |  3:30.65 |    114687    |   130501   
        9  | 29:00.02 |  3:25.52 |    130502    |   145928   
       10  | 32:25.54 |  4:19.23 |    145929    |   165376   
       11  | 36:45.02 |  3:35.42 |    165377    |   181543   


Range status and errors

Selected range

     Filename D:\Music\Sources\2005\12-13 - Bo Bice - The Real Thing [RCA 82876-71196-2]\Bo Bice - The Real Thing.wav

     Peak level 99.9 %
     Extraction speed 4.6 X
     Range quality 99.9 %
     Test CRC 88AD94CA
     Copy CRC 88AD94CA
     Copy OK

No errors occurred

 
AccurateRip summary
 
Track  1  accurately ripped (confidence 4)  [60833634]  (AR v2)
Track  2  accurately ripped (confidence 4)  [3CF69E63]  (AR v2)
Track  3  accurately ripped (confidence 4)  [31C20451]  (AR v2)
Track  4  accurately ripped (confidence 4)  [318D5A6B]  (AR v2)
Track  5  accurately ripped (confidence 4)  [5ED8BB3F]  (AR v2)
Track  6  accurately ripped (confidence 4)  [87E2305F]  (AR v2)
Track  7  accurately ripped (confidence 4)  [35D783BD]  (AR v2)
Track  8  accurately ripped (confidence 4)  [96F1D31A]  (AR v2)
Track  9  cannot be verified as accurate (confidence 64)  [5620C9D5], AccurateRip returned [32846A40]  (AR v2)
Track 10  accurately ripped (confidence 4)  [6D8E9783]  (AR v2)
Track 11  accurately ripped (confidence 4)  [560006FA]  (AR v2)
 
10 track(s) accurately ripped
 1 track(s) could not be verified as accurate

Some tracks could not be verified as accurate

End of status report

---- AcoustID Plugin V1.2.0

Submitting 11 results to AcoustID

AcoustID successfully submitted


---- CUETools DB Plugin V2.2.6

[CTDB TOCID: Rffv9kdE2FPm_k6MLYyz.gp9SBs-] found
Submit result: Rffv9kdE2FPm_k6MLYyz.gp9SBs- has been confirmed
Track | CTDB Status
  1   | (175/177) Accurately ripped
  2   | (176/177) Accurately ripped
  3   | (175/177) Accurately ripped
  4   | (176/177) Accurately ripped
  5   | (176/177) Accurately ripped
  6   | (176/177) Accurately ripped
  7   | (177/177) Accurately ripped
  8   | (175/177) Accurately ripped
  9   | (  1/177) Accurately ripped, or (173/177) differs in 379 samples u/03:05:30-03:05:31,03:11:02-03:11:03,03:11:34-03:11:35,03:11:51-03:11:52,03:11:67,03:12:08-03:12:09,03:12:24-03:12:25,03:12:41,03:12:57-03:12:58,03:12:73,03:13:15,03:13:31,03:13:48,03:13:64,03:14:37-03:14:38,03:14:53-03:14:54,03:15:27,03:15:43,03:15:60,03:16:01,03:16:17-03:16:18,03:16:33-03:16:34,03:17:56-03:17:57,03:17:72,03:19:20
 10   | (177/177) Accurately ripped
 11   | (176/177) Accurately ripped
If you are sure that your rip contains errors, you can use CUETools to repair it.


==== Log checksum 8C178D812E33FCED05D9C10159B85DAEE8E60F37063596626879088D8821ECAB ====

Set up Apollo for teh last month and the data feels stale. finding emails that bounce at like 15-20% which is killing my sender rep. heard good things about Prospeo from a buddy who switched recently.

main things i need: accurate emails (obviously), mobile numbers for multi-touch, and decent API speeds since we're doing 500+ enrichments daily. Apollo's mobile data is pretty sparse from what i've seen.

anyone whos used both - how do they actually compare on email data quality? Prospeo claims weekly updates vs Apollo which i think is monthly? also curious about pricing at scale. we're a team of 8 SDRs doing probaly 10k lookups a month. my manager is already on my ass about deliverability so i need to figure this out fast.

bonus points if you've actually tested thier catch-all handling. Apollo marks everything as "likely valid" on catch-all domains which is basically useless.

We've been using their free tier for basic intent data but hitting walls left and right. Data accuracy is solid when you can actually get to it, but they gate everything useful behind enterprise pricing. Even their 'starter' packages are like 30k minimum from what our sales guy said.

Biggest frustration is they show you all this amazing account intelligence in demos - technographics, buying committee mapping, predictive scoring - then you realize you need their full platform to actually action any of it. We just need basic intent signals to know which accounts are researching our category, not a full blown ABM orchestration platform.

Our marketing lead is getting pressure from leadership to show pipeline influence numbers this quarter, so we can't exactly wait around for a 6sense contract to get approved through procurement. That process alone would take months.

Tried Bombora for raw intent but it's just topics without the account enrichment. Demandbase is the same enterprise pricing problem. Been testing Prospeo for the intent piece and it's actually pretty decent for a fraction of the cost. Anyone found other 6sense alternative tools that don't require a second mortgage? Specifically need intent signals + basic firmographics, don't really care about the fancy predictive stuff.

Set up Apollo for teh last month and the data feels stale. finding emails that bounce at like 15-20% which is killing my sender rep. heard good things about Prospeo from a buddy who switched recently.

main things i need: accurate emails (obviously), mobile numbers for multi-touch, and decent API speeds since we're doing 500+ enrichments daily. Apollo's mobile data is pretty sparse from what i've seen.

anyone whos used both - how do they actually compare on email data quality? Prospeo claims weekly updates vs Apollo which i think is monthly? also curious about pricing at scale. we're a team of 8 SDRs doing probaly 10k lookups a month. my manager is already on my ass about deliverability so i need to figure this out fast.

bonus points if you've actually tested thier catch-all handling. Apollo marks everything as "likely valid" on catch-all domains which is basically useless.

Run a small bookkeeping firm, just me and one part-time helper. Thinking about getting a QR business card but there are so many options and price ranges. What actually matters and what's just a nice-to-have? Dont want to overpay for stuff I'll never use.

Hello,

Here I am again with my progress for the previous month. Marami pa ring OD, pero at least nababawasan na siya ng kaunti. Hopefully matapos na talaga ito soon.

For August, ito po ang mga naisara ko nang loans:

• FT Lending - Fully paid all loans (2/2)
• JuanHand - Fully paid all loans (2/2)
• SLoan - Fully paid 8 out of 12 loans. 4 remaining.

Eto nalang po ang mga remaining kong OLA sa ngayon:

• Tonik Loan (1 active loan)
• TendoPay (auto-deducted sa sahod, until mid-2028 pa)
• Credit Card: UnionBank (IDRP)
• Credit Card: Security Bank (IDRP)
• Atome Card (although I asked for a discount na - sana mabayaran ko ito next)
• GCredit
• GLoan (3 active loans)
• MegaPeso (2 active loans, pero isang hulog nalang silang both)
• SLoan (4 remaining loans as stated above)

Previous progress reports:

• May 2026: https://www.reddit.com/r/ola_harassment/comments/1tjl1y2/konting_progress_may_2026/
• June/July 2026: https://www.reddit.com/r/ola_harassment/comments/1vas2ij/personal_progress_report_junejuly_2026/

See you next month. Pinopost ko lang po siya rito kasi I hope mainspire yung iba na hindi pa huli ang lahat ang makakagawa rin tayo ng paraan, at eventually matatapos rin yan :)

Kapit lang po.

P.S. I also have just now requested the deletion of my account for Cashalo (prev. loan), FT Lending and JuanHand. Goodbye to them.