Is it possible to create a flowchart that can determine this in every situation where a country attacks another country?

Would it be possible to write a computer program that allows someone to fill out a form and then use the answers from that form to determine whether the military action was morally acceptable?

When I say "morally acceptable", I'm referring to what would be "morally acceptable" to marxist-leninists. I understand that "morally acceptable" is vague, but I can't think of better words.

I have trouble understanding when a military action is justified, which often ends up with me being vaguely "anti-war" and feeling confused.

/gen

ATLA is primarily for genocide enthusiasts. We know this because there was a genocide.

LOK is primarily for football (soccer) players. We know this because they play football.

The revolution cannot triumph without the emancipation of women March 8, 1987 - Thomas Sankara

Women still felt excluded

> Though our men have already reached the edges of this great garden that is the revolution, our women are still confined within the shadows of anonymity. Among themselves, in voices loud or soft, they talk of the hopes that have embraced Burkina-hopes that are, for them, still merely fine words. The revolution’s promise is already a reality for men. But for women, it is still merely a rumor. And yet the authenticity and the future of our revolution depend on women.

Women felt excluded from the revolution because they were still being oppressed by men.

Sexist men that claim to be progressive

> And what should we think of those little men, also progressive, who get together in sleazy places to talk about the women they have taken advantage of? They think this is the way they will be able to measure up to other men and even humiliate some of them, by having seduced their wives. In reality, such men are pitiful and insignificant. They would not even enter our discussion if it were not for the fact that their criminal behavior has been undermining the morale and virtue of many fine women whose contribution to our revolution could be of the utmost importance. > > And then there are those more-or-less revolutionary militants-much less revolutionary than more-who do not accept that their wives should also be politically active; or who allow them to be active by day and by day only; or who beat their wives because they have gone out to meetings or to a demonstration at night. > > Oh, these suspicious, jealous men! What narrow-mindedness! And what a limited, partial commitment! For is it only at night that a woman who is disenchanted and determined can deceive her husband? And what is this political commitment that expects her to stop political activity at nightfall and resume her rights and responsibilities only at daybreak? And, finally, what should we make of remarks about women made by all kinds of activists, the one more revolutionary than the next, remarks such as “women are despicably materialist,” “manipulators,” “clowns,” “liars,” “gossips,” “schemers,” ”jealous,” and so on? Maybe this is all true of women. But surely it is equally true of men.

There are a lot of sexist men who think of themselves as progressive. They claim to advocate for liberation, but continue oppressing women.

Law

> On the level of the ministries of labor and justice, texts should constantly be kept in line with the transformation our society has been going through since August 4, 1983, so that equality between men and women can be a tangible reality. The new labor code, now being debated and prepared, should express how profoundly our people aspire to social justice. It should mark an important stage in the work of destroying the neocolonial state apparatus, a class apparatus fashioned by reactionary regimes in order to perpetuate the system that oppressed the masses, especially women. > > How could we continue to accept that a woman doing the same work as a man should earn less? Can we continue to accept dowries and forcing widows to marry their brothers-in-law, which reduce our sisters and mothers to common commodities to be bartered for? There are so many medieval laws still imposed on our people, particularly women, that it is only just that, finally, justice be done.

There are laws that oppress women. Laws and labor codes need to change.