u/Think_Fact1155

This seems to be the first movie of the rumored trilogy with Tiana's daughter and Flynn's son who's mother isn't Rapunzel but a villain.

According to the first pic, Rapunzel's daughter is also gonna appear, so I guess she'll her half-brother, unless her father is also someone else but I highly doubt that; but now that I think about it, it could be interesting (as long as she had her before she met Flynn)- maybe before leaving her tower she met a boy, they fell in love, and had a child, who the boy took because Mother Gothel would obviously be enraged if she found out. And they used a spell that they either found in a spell book that belonged to Mother Gothel or the boy himself knew some magic to hide the pregnancy. Honestly, I kinda really want this to happen now lol

The multiverse certainly sounds interesting. And I literally just realized right after I was done typing that last sentence... maybe Fraiser is Flynn's son from a different universe, and the Flynn we all know didn't have a child before he met Rapunzel. I wonder what exactly they mean by "real world" in the second pic. My best guesses would be the main universe or the other universes are something like storybook realms

When making this post, I also found this article. One thing that made me (mentally) groan was seeing Anastasia Tremaine's child as one of the villains. I know most people don't, but I strongly believe Disney's direct-to-video/made for TV sequels are just as canon to Descendants as the original movies*, even if Disney doesn't acknowledge them much (which they should imo). And I know in the books Anastasia and Iago are both on the Isle, but the books aren't even completely canon to begin with, shown by how the Queen of Hearts was on the Isle and I think there's other inconsistencies too. I know it's not really fair to get annoyed at the writers because I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't even know of these sequels' existence (which is on Disney), but still.

Overall the story sounds really interesting, and I honestly hope it's real. I initially didn't like it because it seemed like Flynn must've cheated on Rapunzel or broken up with her to have this child with this mystery villain, but I realized that he could've met this villain and had him before he met Rapunzel.

*If anybody cares, here's my spin-off idea where Anastasia's redemption is brought up and her son is an HK; and there's even a somewhat meta reference how "later stories aren't taught in history class that much and aren't as well known", referring to how Disney most ignores their direct-to-video/made for TV sequels nowadays

Assuming this is true, even though Wicked Wonderland is my favorite of the movies so far, part of me wishes we got another time travel movie where they have to fix other characters' histories instead

I once had this idea which was about Lefty, the other gangsters, and the underground criminal organizations of Sesame Street; I sadly don't remember any other details though😭😭😭

I remember being intrigued by the Muppet Wiki's description of the gangsters:

>Although Sesame Street is meant to represent a child-friendly, and somewhat idyllic, New York City street, the neighborhood has a network of seedy underground criminal organizations.

The concept of underground criminal organizations within Sesame Street of all places sounds really cool imo. A movie could really dive deeper into this forgotten aspect of Sesame Street lore

Also, they should bring these characters back to the show regardless. They could even be used to show how there's bootlegs of toys that look very close to the authentic ones (you'd be surprised at how deceiving bootlegs can be), although frankly, I don't think that's the most important thing for kids to lean lol; although maybe it'd work if there was a lesson about how you should buy the authentic one because it's the right thing to do and explains how people selling the bootlegs just stole all the hard work the original creators did and how that's unfair, which is also used to explain how even you shouldn't steal others' ideas. What do you guys think?

I don't specifically remember if Karliak's performance was similar to Wilder's, but considering that a lot of the movie was a shot-by-shot remake of the 1971 movie, I think it's safe to say they tried to make him a Wilder impersonator

Or they could've used Timothée Chalamet from Wonka, or even Johnny Depp from the 2005 film, although most people probably wouldn't like that

And she was friends with Maddox, who stated himself that he'd be in trouble if the Queen found out he was "harboring a fugitive". So clearly he's also in danger by not only being friends with her but helping her escape capture, so I feel like she would at least try to be friends with Chester in secret. I know she realizes that her caring about others was a weakness after her friends' transformations, but still

And also, I know that Chester turns into a cat, but being related to the Cheshire Cat, why isn't he one to begin with?! Heck, why are Dora and Katy seemingly not a mouse and caterpillar respectively either?!

I get that the movies might not have a high enough budget, which is why Uma and Uliana are mostly human, and they made Robbie a person instead of an anthropomorphic fox like in the 1973 cartoon, but it's not gonna cost extra money to make characters animals in a book!!

I honestly don't know if it's possible. I could maybe see Maddox being redeemed , but she might be beyond redemption...

mainly for u/FantasyLovingWriter