
A conversation about veganism made me think differently about why we exploit animals
I recently watched a conversation between Acharya Prashant and Poorva Joshipura, President of PETA International.
They were discussing animal exploitation—particularly how chickens are selectively bred and fed so that they become physically “top-heavy” very quickly, because the faster they grow, the sooner they can be used for profit.
Then Acharya suddenly brought up a completely different example: an Indian parent putting their 8–10-year-old child into English classes, coding, personality development, dance, tennis, extra literature, etc., until the child becomes “top-heavy” mentally.
His argument was that the important thing isn't that the two situations are literally identical. He was asking whether the agency behind them can be similar: developing or shaping another being primarily because we expect something in return.
He then takes this even further—talking about the “ROI” we sometimes expect from our children, relationships and other people.
Does veganism need to go into these deeper roots of everyday life?
does looking at these connections strengthen the ethical case for veganism, or does it take the discussion too far away from the specific issue of animal rights?