u/ansyhrrian

r/lawncare r/loicense r/surfing r/NFLv2 r/classiccars r/BirdsArentReal r/UpliftingConservation r/curb r/funny r/NoStupidQuestions r/pics r/LasVegas r/worldnews r/HumorInPoorTaste r/protectUSelections r/goodnews r/moviecritic r/DataHoarder r/mildlyinfuriating r/QuiverQuantitative r/delta r/the_everything_bubble r/scifi r/Library r/Colorado r/sandiego r/todayilearned r/poker r/arresteddevelopment r/facepalm r/thechallengemtv r/politics r/solar r/synology r/nyc r/maybemaybemaybe r/BadDesigns r/Whatcouldgowrong r/fresno r/globaltrumpopposition r/PleX r/Detroit r/StandUpComedy r/FuckImOld r/socal r/EnoughMuskSpam r/povertyfinance r/lookatmydog r/pools r/3Dprinting r/redneckengineering r/litrpg r/WhitePeopleTwitter r/SipsTea r/liberalgunowners r/OnionLovers r/CAguns r/hotdogs r/suddenlyrussians r/NonPoliticalTwitter r/Journalism r/EnoughTrumpSpam r/ems r/USNewsHub r/orangecounty r/Goldendoodles r/newyorkcity r/retrogaming r/unsound r/DemSocialistAlliance r/electrifyeverything r/trashy r/TheWordFuck r/therewasanattempt r/mildlypenis r/democrats r/scotus r/Rivian r/EatTheRich r/WallStreetbetsELITE r/SweatyPalms r/CatastrophicFailure r/GlobalNews r/technology r/WeirdWheels r/UnderReportedNews r/holdmybeer r/itookapicture r/oddlysatisfying r/Appliances r/cringepics r/Acadiana r/entertainment r/toolgifs r/California r/BlueskySocial r/news2 r/InvictaSolaris r/typewriters r/news r/ModSupport r/nextfuckinglevel r/tylertx r/AbruptChaos r/TheDeepDraft r/skiing r/globalelectrification r/CelebrityLookalikes r/MurderedByWords r/toptalent r/InternationalNews r/interestingasfuck r/PoliticalHumor r/MadeMeSmile r/EatItYouFuckinCoward
The two most uncomfortable movies I’ve ever watched

The two most uncomfortable movies I’ve ever watched

My son and I both agree that Obsession (2026) is slightly and only minimally less creepy and disturbing than It Follows (2014). And we really enjoyed It Follows overall, if you can describe being creeped out and disturbed for 1.5 hours “enjoyment” (you can).

Obsession, though, is a rough flick. Loved it. Hated it.

What’s next?

Edit: getting so many fantastic recommendations! Thank you!

u/ansyhrrian — 2 days ago
▲ 2.9k r/funny+1 crossposts

Josh has got a pretty good leg, although the goalie should've been more diligent

u/ansyhrrian — 2 days ago
▲ 2.5k r/scifi

In his book "Asimov's Guide to Shakespeare" (1970), he wrote "When stupidity is considered patriotism, it is unsafe to be intelligent."

Asimov used the line while analyzing the Battle of Patay in Henry VI, Part One to describe the dangers of stubbornly fighting a hopeless battle out of a misguided sense of honor.

As a huge fan of Asimov and the Robot series, his 3 laws of robotics read:

  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

Should his quote from above be considered as a potential fourth law? E.g. "A robot may not obey an order that requires it to mistake ideology, patriotism, honor, or obedience for the prevention of actual human harm."

u/ansyhrrian — 3 days ago

Oof

Text from OC Register article here.

Only one large U.S. housing market has more out-of-whack home pricing than Orange County.

That worrisome trend was revealed in a study by John Burns Research and Consulting, which examined the historical relationships between prices, mortgage rates and incomes as of May in 33 major U.S. housing markets – including eight in California.

Orange County pricing was estimated to be 35% too high relative to its underlying economic fundamentals. Only Indianapolis homes at 42% were more overvalued, a signal that even in the lower-priced Midwest, housing values make little monetary sense.

Now, numerous real estate gurus like to suggest that anyone who’s describing a sickly housing market has little credibility. But these numbers come from one of the most respected research shops in the industry.

So contemplate these stats showing the typical U.S. home is priced 26% above a house hunter’s long-term purchasing power. To John Burns, anything above 20% is in “very overpriced” status.

Curiously, my trusty spreadsheet found that housing in much of California was less overpriced relative to homebuying fundamentals than in other parts of the nation.

The median overvaluation of the eight Golden State markets was 18%. That’s well below the 25% pricing overvaluation in the 25 markets outside the state.

This misalignment shows up in the marketplace as a standoff between what sellers demand and what buyers can pay. This affordability chasm has put home sales in crash mode for four years.

How unaffordable?

Who can buy at these prices?

Well, the California Association of Realtors estimates that only 22% of Golden State households would qualify to buy the $843,000 median-priced single-family home in the first quarter of 2026. And that feat requires a $205,000 household income – plus a 169,000 down payment.

The only good news: Affordability is up from 19% a year earlier.

Nationally, 44% of Americans can afford the $404,000 national median-priced house – with a $98,000 income required. Affordability was 40% in the first quarter of 2025.

The grand question: What combination of house construction, more owners selling, cheaper mortgages, higher incomes – and, yes, price cuts – will it take to revive homebuying?

Mispriced markets

Consider the overvaluation levels for the seven other California markets in the study, in order of their national ranking:

– San Diego: 25% overvalued, No. 14 of 33.

– Inland Empire: 25% overvalued, No. 14.

– Los Angeles County: 19% overvalued, No. 23.

– San Jose: 17% overvalued, No. 26.

– San Francisco: 16% overvalued, No. 27.

– Sacramento: 16% overvalued, No. 27.

– East Bay: 11% overvalued, No. 31.

By the way, price cuts work magic.

The nation’s least overvalued market – the only one deemed “fairly priced” by the analysis – was Austin. The Texas city, which has seen home values slashed as economic growth cooled, has prices deemed only 6% too high.

u/ansyhrrian — 3 days ago
▲ 1.9k r/democrats

Reporter: "J.D. Vance said he thinks you’ll be the leading Democratic candidate for president in 2028. What’s your response?” AOC: "I hope HE runs."

u/ansyhrrian — 4 days ago
▲ 1.9k r/newyorkcity+1 crossposts

How does a NYC officer afford over $36K of red-light speeding violations, and more importantly how are they still on the force?

u/ansyhrrian — 4 days ago