
u/EUobs

Ukrainians no longer need expensive Western missiles to blow up bridges in Russian occupied territories
euobserver.comHow do Poles think international media should report on Poland–Ukraine historical disputes?
Hi everyone,
We're journalists who recently worked on a story about the latest Poland–Ukraine dispute over WWII memory. While researching it, we realised these topics are incredibly complex and often viewed very differently inside and outside Poland 👉 Read more on: How a Polish-Ukrainian dispute over WW2 spiralled into a tit-for-tat medal spat
We'd genuinely like to learn from people here.
What context do you think international media most often misses when covering Poland's historical relationship with Ukraine? Are there common misconceptions or nuances you wish foreign journalists understood better?
We're asking because we'd like to improve how we cover these issues in the future.
Has your opinion on supporting Ukraine changed since 2022?
We recently reported on Bulgaria's role in supporting Ukraine during the first years of the full-scale invasion. Our reporting suggests Bulgaria played a much bigger role than many people outside the country realised, particularly in supplying ammunition and military equipment.
Today, however, Bulgarian leaders increasingly argue that Bulgaria has done enough.
We'd genuinely like to hear from people in Bulgaria:
👉 Has public opinion changed since 2022? Do you think Bulgaria has found the right balance, or should its approach be different now?
ATMs are down and petrol is running out even on the black market. How Ukrainian attacks are changing life in Crimea
euobserver.comCrimea fuel crisis sparks rare public anger as residents question Putin’s promises
euobserver.comAre the EU's foreign policy problems caused more by its institutions or by the quality of its leaders?
We recently published an opinion piece examining why the European Union often struggles to respond coherently to major foreign policy crises: Read our opinion piece by Shada Islam on: The EU’s foreign policy problem isn’t institutions – it’s the quality of its leaders.
One argument is that debates tend to focus on institutional reform, such as unanimity voting, veto powers, or treaty changes, while overlooking another factor: the political choices made by national leaders. They argue that even well-designed institutions cannot compensate for a lack of political will or strategic leadership, while others contend that the current institutional framework itself limits what leaders can realistically achieve.
This raises a broader question for discussion:
👉 Are EU’s foreign policy' problem the institutions or the quality of its leaders?
We're interested in hearing arguments for both perspectives.
Ukraine decimating Russia’s truck fleet, as Putin gives deluded press briefing
euobserver.comPutin keen to offset bad news on Crimea by capture of Kostyantynivka, as Russians advance by crawling between houses (Ukraine Battlefield update, Day 1,582)
euobserver.comDrone control means Ukrainians only need to wait for Russia's economic crisis, expert says
euobserver.comUkraine strikes on Russian bridges becoming painfully precise (Ukraine Battlefield Update, Day 1,581)
euobserver.comEU praises open source for tech sovereignty — then backs W, a private for-profit microblogging platform
euobserver.comMEPs back digital euro as 'geopolitical necessity' to counter US payment-system dominance
euobserver.comThe European Union’s culture of secrecy is a threat to democracy
euobserver.comHalf of Crimea goes dark after Ukraine cuts off electricity, as well as fuel (Ukraine Battlefield update, Day 1,580)
euobserver.com👉 Do you think the outside world understands the difference between Lukashenko's regime and Belarusian society?
In our interview with Belarusian opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, she argues that Belarusians should not be viewed as an extension of Russia and do not share the Kremlin's imperial ambitions.
At the same time, Belarus remains closely tied to Moscow and has become increasingly dependent on Russia since 2020.
👉 Do you think the outside world understands the difference between Lukashenko's regime and Belarusian society? What is something we might be missing? Let us know your thoughts.
Why do governments increasingly frame independent NGOs as foreign threats rather than democratic safeguards?
Our latest investigation looks at Slovakia's escalating conflict with NGOs and the broader struggle over who gets to shape public debate.
- Our investigation found that Slovakia's government is escalating pressure on NGOs through new regulations, public attacks, and rhetoric portraying some civil society groups as agents of foreign influence.
- Critics say the measures are less about transparency and more about weakening independent watchdogs that scrutinize those in power.
- Similar tactics have appeared in countries from Hungary and Georgia to Russia and beyond, often under the banner of sovereignty and national interests.
👉 Why do governments increasingly frame independent NGOs as foreign threats rather than democratic safeguards? #EU
What is your opinion? Let us know.
Crimea faces ’energy desert’: Authorities completely stop fuel sales and cancel tourist season (Ukraine Battlefield update, Day 1,579)
euobserver.comIsrael has bombed and bulldozed €150m of EU-funded buildings in Gaza and West Bank; but never paid back a cent
This investigation raises a policy question about accountability, not just destruction. EU taxpayers funded hospitals, desalination plants, schools and other civilian infrastructure in Gaza and the West Bank that EUobserver reports were later bombed, bulldozed or seized by Israel, with no repayment to the EU.
The key issue is incentives: if Brussels limits itself to diplomatic letters while continuing normal relations, what stops the same pattern from repeating during future reconstruction?
It also puts EU governments in a difficult position — funding Palestinian infrastructure, then absorbing the cost when it is destroyed, without imposing financial or political consequences.