u/Mcfreely2

August 2026

H.R.9925, the FRONTIER Act, establishes federal oversight of frontier artificial intelligence models exceeding a high compute threshold. Introduced July 23, 2026 by Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA) with bipartisan cosponsors including Rep. Lori Trahan (D-MA), it requires transparency frameworks, independent audits, and incident reporting for large frontier developers under the Department of Commerce.

The bill interfaces with existing state rules through targeted preemption. It bars states from imposing new substantive obligations on developers specifically for frontier AI risk transparency, third-party verification, and incident reporting. Carve-outs preserve generally applicable laws, deployment rules, and protections for minors.

For states this means limited ability to expand development-side requirements on the largest models. The right in tension is state authority over emerging technology risks. Similar federal preemption efforts have appeared in prior AI drafts.

At scale the measure centralizes catastrophic-risk rules while leaving deployment regulation largely to states. Verify the introduced text and committee referrals. Independent review of the preemption section remains essential before any further action.

Sources

H.R.9925 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): FRONTIER Act

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9925

Official bill page confirming introduction date, sponsor Rep. Jay Obernolte, bipartisan cosponsors, and referral to Energy and Commerce and Science committees.

Text - H.R.9925 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): FRONTIER Act

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9925/text/ih

Full introduced text containing the precise preemption language in Section 9 limiting state obligations on frontier AI transparency, audits, and incident reporting, plus listed carve-outs.

The FRONTIER Act Explained: What H.R. 9925 Means for Frontier AI Regulation

https://statt.com/blog/frontier-act-federal-ai-regulation-2026/

Details the bipartisan sponsorship, compute threshold for frontier models, and scoped preemption of state development-side rules.

Congress' AI Bill Could Override State AI Laws

https://www.forbes.com/sites/lanceeliot/2026/07/27/federal-ai-laws-that-aim-to-overrule-state-ai-laws-are-getting-on-the-nerves-of-state-lawmakers/

Analyzes Section 9 preemption and its potential interaction with existing state frontier safety statutes such as California’s SB 53.

Where State AI Legislation Stands Half Way Into 2026

https://techpolicy.press/where-state-ai-legislation-stands-half-way-into-2026

Documents that states had enacted 109 AI laws by July 1, 2026, providing context for the volume of measures potentially affected by targeted federal preemption.

Earlier this month, federal prosecutors moved to strip citizenship from 25 naturalized Americans, accusing them of lying about their pasts and hiding serious crimes.

The move is called denaturalization, and the Justice Department now calls it one of its top priorities.

Justice correspondent u/AliRogin_PBSNewsHour looks at what's behind this dramatic shift in law enforcement strategy. For more: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/doj-deploys-tactic-to-strip-naturalized-americans-of-citizenship

I do not know who the speaker is, if you do let me know.

REJECT THE BILLIONAIRES. VOTE IN EVERY LOCAL ELECTION.

These are not religious people. They're hate-thy-neighbor heretic hate-triots, using Jesus as their own personal shield from the consequences of their hate speech and hate actions, against every teaching of Jesus in the New Testament. It's Christianity without the Christ, for pure performative posturing themselves selfishly as a moral minority. In practice they attack the weak and marginalized, and militarize officers against the elderly defending them. Hate-thy-neighbor anti-Christ values.

Reject their attempt to revive the red scare movement

r/FortWorth/comments/1vhg61b/a_small_group_of_extremists_has_completely_taken/

Vote, donate, block walk, phone / text bank, signup for email updates

https://votealisasimmons.com/

Support the grassroots

https://www.focuslocalpac.com/

Credit: @so.mexican

A security guard at a McDonald's in north Minneapolis is getting attention after refusing to let two masked ICE agents go behind the restaurant's counter while they were searching for a man.

The encounter happened Jan. 8 at the McDonald's on West Broadway Avenue. Security guard Red Wooten, 49, met the agents near the entrance and stopped them when they attempted to access the employee-only area.

"You can't come back here, bro," Wooten told one of the agents in video of the encounter.
When an agent responded, "I'm talking to your manager, Wooten replied, "No, you're talking to security, I'm in charge."

The agents eventually left without taking the man they were looking for. Wooten later said the man who had entered the restaurant appeared frightened, but maintained that his actions were also about doing the job he was hired to do.

"I was doing my job like I'm supposed to," Wooten said. "If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything."

Restaurant owner Justin Baylor said Wooten made the best judgment call he could at the time. Following the encounter, the restaurant posted a sign stating that ICE and other law enforcement officers are not permitted to enter without a proper judicial warrant.

Wooten has since received plenty of attention from the community, with some people even stopping by the McDonald's to thank him and take photos with him.

For reference, my grandfather a retired CBP officer who served at the border for 27 years,

And when I asked them what their personal thoughts were for instances of ICE shooting at moving vehicles like this, they said they were trained to NEVER fire at someone just trying to drive away.